Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd T/A Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 4134


[2019] FWCA 4134
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd T/A Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd
(AG2019/1333)

HEATHGATE RESOURCES PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018

Mining industry

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 17 JUNE 2019

Application for approval of the Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 3 June 2019.

[3] On 4 June 2019, I conducted a telephone conference with the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including the provision of an undertaking.

[4] The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 7 June 2019. The undertaking deals with the following topics:

  The Applicant has inserted a revised National Employment Standards (NES) precedence clause.

  A definition of a shift worker has been inserted.

  The entitlement to annual leave has been expressed in weeks.

  The entitlement to personal/carer’s leave has been expressed in days.

[5] A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representatives did not express any view on the undertaking.

[6] The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[7] The “‘Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union’ known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU)”, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

[8] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[9] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 17 June 2023.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE503924 PR709355>

Details
AGLC
Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd T/A Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 4134
Case
[2019] FWCA 4134
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd, trading as Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd, was involved in a legal matter concerning the approval of their Enterprise Agreement 2018. The application was brought before a relevant Australian authority, tasked with determining whether the proposed agreement met the necessary legal standards for approval. The dispute arose from concerns about the fairness and compliance of the agreement with applicable industrial laws. The primary focus of the court was to assess whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms for employees and adhered to the requirements set forth in the Fair Work Act 2009.

The court was required to decide several key legal issues. First, it had to determine if the agreement was genuinely negotiated between the employer and the employees or their representatives. Second, it had to evaluate whether the agreement contained provisions that were fair and reasonable in all aspects. This included assessing the balance of the agreement in terms of benefits, entitlements, and obligations for both the employer and employees. The court also had to consider whether the agreement complied with relevant industrial laws and if it was likely to lead to improved industrial relations between the parties involved.

In its reasoning, the court examined the evidence provided regarding the negotiation process and the terms of the agreement. It found that the agreement had been genuinely negotiated and contained provisions that were fair and reasonable. The court concluded that the agreement met all the necessary criteria for approval, including compliance with the Fair Work Act 2009. Consequently, the application for the approval of the Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018 was successful, and the agreement was approved.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.