Health Services Union v Lyndoch Living Inc T/A Lyndoch Living
[2016] FWC 7194
•6 OCTOBER 2016
| [2016] FWC 7194 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.459—Protected action
Health Services Union
v
Lyndoch Living Inc T/A Lyndoch Living
(B2016/1060)
COMMISSIONER HARPER-GREENWELL | MELBOURNE, 6 OCTOBER 2016 |
Application to extend the 30-day period in relation to B2016/823.
[1] On 29 September 2016 the Health Services Union Victoria No. 1 Branch trading as the Health Workers Union (HWU) made an application pursuant to s.459(3) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) to extend the 30 day period in which industrial action is authorised to occur. The HWU had not previously sought to extend the period.
[2] The Protected Action Ballot Order was made by Commissioner Wilson on 29 July 2016. 1 The ballot was declared by the Australian Electoral Commission on 6 September 2016. Therefore, the 30 day period (starting from the date of the declaration of the ballot) expires on 6 October 2016.
[3] Section 459 of the Act provides as follows:
“Circumstances in which industrial action is authorised by protected action ballot
(1) Industrial action by employees is authorised by a protected action ballot if:
(a) the action was the subject of the ballot; and
(b) at least 50% of the employees on the roll of voters for the ballot voted in the ballot; and
(c) more than 50% of the valid votes were votes approving the action; and
(d) the action commences:
(i) during the 30-day period starting on the date of the declaration of the results of the ballot; or
(ii) if the FWC has extended that period under subsection (3)—during the extended period.
Note Under Division 2, industrial action by employees for a proposed enterprise agreement (other than employee response action) is not protected industrial action unless it has been authorised in advance by a protected action ballot.
(2) If:
(a) the nature of the proposed industrial action specified in the question or questions put to the employees in the protected action ballot included periods of industrial action of a particular duration; and
(b) the question or questions did not specify that consecutive periods of that industrial action may be organised or engaged in;
then only the first period in a series of consecutive periods of that industrial action is the subject of the ballot for the purposes of paragraph (1)(a).
(3) The FWC may extend the 30-day period referred to in subparagraph (1)(d)(i) by up to 30 days if:
(a) an applicant for the protected action ballot order applies to the FWC for the period to be extended; and
(b) the period has not previously been extended.”
[4] On 3 October 2016, the Commission wrote to Lyndoch Living Inc (Lyndoch) to ascertain if there was any objection to the application. Lyndoch advised the Commission in writing that it does not oppose the application for extension made by the HWU.
[5] It is the view of the Commission that there is no need to hold a hearing to determine this matter. The requirements in s.459(3)(a) and (b) have been met.
[6] The application for an extension of the 30 day period is granted.
[7] An Order 2 to this effect will be issued today.
COMMISSIONER
1 PR583485.
2 PR586188.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR586187>
0
0
0