Health Services Union v Clinpath Laboratories Pty Ltd T/A Clinpath Pathology

Case [2025] FWC 1153


[2025] FWC 1153

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Health Services Union
v
Clinpath Laboratories Pty Ltd T/A Clinpath Pathology

(B2025/666)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMPTON

ADELAIDE, 28 APRIL 2025

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Clinpath Laboratories Pty Ltd T/A Clinpath Pathology

  1. This is an application by the Health Services’ Union (HSU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Clinpath Laboratories Pty Ltd trading as Clinpath Pathology (Clinpath or Employer). The Commission understands that the parties are bargaining for an agreement to replace the Clinpath Laboratories – Enterprise Agreement 2021.

  1. On 24 April 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer objected to the Application on the grounds which included contended uncertainty about the employees to be subject to the ballot, the proposed ballot questions, and certain safety concerns.

  1. In the circumstances, I scheduled a hearing to be conducted today to determine the matter. In the lead up to the hearing the parties continued constructive discussions and ultimately reached a common position on the above grounds. In that light, I have granted leave to amend the application and otherwise dealt with the application on the papers.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Angela Osborn-Johnson, Organiser, setting out the steps taken by the HSU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Clinpath, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The ballot is to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS). CiVS has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

  1. For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 15 May 2025.[1] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.

  1. I am satisfied that there are relevant exceptional circumstances required by s.443(5), justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Act when taking industrial action set out in the Order made by the Commission. The minimum extended notice period of four (4) working days applies to the items listed within Clause 5 of the Order.

  1. An Order has been separately issued in PR786428.

  1. This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] This is, in effect, 10 working days from the anticipated commencement of the ballot and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR786429>

Details
AGLC
Health Services Union v Clinpath Laboratories Pty Ltd T/A Clinpath Pathology [2025] FWC 1153
Case
[2025] FWC 1153
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Health Services Union (HSU) applied to the Fair Work Commission for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Clinpath Laboratories Pty Ltd trading as Clinpath Pathology. The application was made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The HSU sought the order in the context of ongoing bargaining to replace the existing Clinpath Laboratories – Enterprise Agreement 2021. The employer objected to the application on the basis that there was uncertainty about the employees to be balloted, the proposed ballot questions, and certain safety concerns. The Deputy President scheduled a hearing but the parties reached an agreement before the hearing.

The Deputy President found that all the requirements of s.443(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 were met. The Health Services Union had genuinely tried to reach an agreement with the employer. The Commission determined that the date by which voting was to close was 15 May 2025, which was 10 working days from the anticipated commencement of the ballot. The ballot was to be conducted by Democratic Outcomes Pty Ltd (CiVS), which was an approved protected action ballot agent. The Deputy President found that there were exceptional circumstances justifying an extended period of written notice for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009. A minimum extended notice period of four working days applied to the items listed within Clause 5 of the order.

The Fair Work Commission granted the Health Services Union’s application for a protected action ballot order. The Commission set 15 May 2025 as the closing date for voting. The Commission also set an extended notice period of four working days for the purposes of s.414(2)(b) of the Fair Work Act 2009. The matter will be assigned to another member of the Commission to conduct a compulsory conciliation conference. The Deputy President issued an order to that effect.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.