Health Services Union v Bendigo Health

Case [2022] FWC 861


[2022] FWC 861

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.437—Protected action

Health Services Union

v

Bendigo Health

(B2022/309)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 13 APRIL 2022

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Bendigo Health.

  1. This is an application by the Health Services Union (Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Bendigo Health (the Respondent).

  1. On 13 April 2022, I held a mention where the Respondent advised it did not object to the application. However, it raised a number of concerns in relation to the form and content of the draft order. The parties were able to reach a consent position.

  1. In the circumstances, I have decided to determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

  1. On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Mr Craig McGregor of the Applicant setting out the steps taken by it in bargaining with the Respondent and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with the Respondent, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

  1. The Applicant sought that a person other than the Australian Electoral Commission be the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. This course was not opposed by the Respondent. The person proposed in the application as the protected action ballot agent is TrueVote Pty Ltd (TrueVote). I am satisfied that TrueVote is a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot. I am also satisfied that TrueVote is capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and of conducting the ballot expeditiously. TrueVote has agreed to be the protected action ballot agent and is bound to comply with the Privacy Act 1998 with respect to the handling of the information relating to the protected action ballot.

  1. Therefore I appoint TrueVote as the protected action ballot agent.

  1. An order has been separately issued in PR740355.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR740354>

Details
AGLC
Health Services Union v Bendigo Health [2022] FWC 861
Case
[2022] FWC 861
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Health Services Union (Applicant) lodged an application under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) with the Fair Work Commission, seeking an order for a protected action ballot of certain employees of Bendigo Health (Respondent). Bendigo Health did not oppose the application but raised concerns about the form and content of the draft order. The Applicant had been attempting to reach an agreement with Bendigo Health and had taken steps to do so. The matter was determined on the papers without a hearing as the parties reached a consent position.

The Applicant sought to appoint TrueVote Pty Ltd (TrueVote) as the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. Bendigo Health did not oppose the appointment of TrueVote as the ballot agent. TrueVote agreed to conduct the ballot in accordance with the Privacy Act 1998 and to ensure the secrecy and security of the votes and the expeditious conduct of the ballot. Deputy President Clancy was satisfied that TrueVote was a fit and proper person to conduct the ballot and capable of ensuring the secrecy and security of the votes and conducting the ballot expeditiously.

The Deputy President concluded that the requirements of s.443(1) of the Act had been met, and TrueVote was appointed as the ballot agent for the protected action ballot. The Deputy President issued a separate order in PR740355, which is not included in the extract provided.

The final orders of the Deputy President were to appoint TrueVote as the ballot agent for the protected action ballot, and the matter was finalised.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.