Health Sector Awards – Pandemic Leave

Case [2020] FWC 1956


[2020] FWC 1956
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

STATEMENT


Fair Work Act 2009

s.158— variation of a modern award to achieve the modern award objective

Health Sector Awards – Pandemic Leave
(AM2020/13)

JUSTICE ROSS, PRESIDENT

MELBOURNE, 15 APRIL 2020

[1] On 8 April 2020 a Full Bench of the Commission issued a Decision 1 (the April 2020 Decision) varying 99 modern awards to insert a new Schedule – ‘Schedule X: additional measures during the COVID-19 pandemic’.

[2] During the course of the proceedings relating to the April 2020 Decision the ACTU, AMNF, the HSU and APESMA made submissions regarding the particular circumstances of health care workers. The awards which were the subject of those submissions are as follows:

  Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services Award 2010

  Aged Care Aware 2010

  Ambulance and Patience Transport Industry Award 2010

  Health Professionals and Support Services Award 2010

  Medical Practitioners Award 2010

  Nurses Award 2010

  Pharmacy Industry Award 2010

  Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010

  Supported Employment Services Award 2010

[3] In the April 2020 Decision the Full Bench responded to these submissions as follows:

‘We will shortly convene a conference of interested parties with a view to establishing a separate process to address the issues raised by the ACTU, ANMF, APESMA and HSU.’ 2

[4] On 9 April 2020 I published a Statement 3 in respect of these issues and convened a conference on Tuesday 14 April 2020, at 2pm, to discuss the following matters:

  the coverage and application of each of the awards mentioned in [2] above. In particular, whether the practical application extends to each award extends to each State and Territory and the extent of enterprise agreement coverage;

  the nature of the claim advanced by the relevant unions; and

  the process for dealing with the claims advanced.

[5] The following materials were attached to the 9 April Statement to assist in the discussion at the Conference:

(i) Article ‘SARS-CoV-2 viral load and the severity of COVID-19’ – published by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford and referenced in the HSU submission to AM2020/12.

(ii) Information note on employees mapped to the Health industry awards.

[6] The conference was attended by:

  Ms J Baulch, APESMA

  Ms A Moussa, Victorian Ambulance Union

  Ms R Liebhaber, Health Services Union

  Mr T Clarke, ACTU

  Mr S Bull, United Workers Union

  Ms M De Vecchis, Australian Salaried Medical Officers Federation

  Ms L Fisher, Private Hospital Industry Employers’ Association

  Mr M Robson, Australian Services Union

  Ms R Bhatt and Mr B Ferguson, Ai Group

  Mr M Pegg, National Disability Services

  Ms K Wischer, Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation

  Ms P Thomson, Australian Federation of Employers and Industry

  Ms S Harris, Pharmacy Guild of Australia

  Mr M Skulley, Workplace Express

[7] A transcript of the conference is available here.

[8] The key issues arising from the conference are as follows:

1. A separate page has been set up in the major cases part of the Commission’s website, which can be viewed here: health sector awards – pandemic leave. Interested parties can subscribe to updates to be notified when documents are published on the major case site, by creating an account or logging in and selecting the Health sector awards – pandemic leave announcement service.

2. The ACTU is coordinating the finalisation of the unions’ claims in respect of this matter and s.158 applications to vary will be filed shortly.

3. The ACTU will advise my chambers when the unions are in a position to advance a proposed timetable for the hearing and determination of the claims. The ACTU will discuss the proposed timetable with the various employer interests.

As to the coverage and application of each of the awards mentioned in [2] above, the list below breaks down the agreements in the health sector that have a nominal expiry dates from 1 June 2019 into the following industry sub-groups:

Industry

Current agreements

Aged care industry

474

Ambulance and patient transport

11

Health and welfare services

655

Indigenous organisations and services

4

Social, community, home care and disability services

201

Grand Total

1345

The Health and welfare agreements cover nurses, allied health professionals, support and administrative staff. Consistent with the national system jurisdiction, there are agreements for public hospitals in Victoria and the territories but not elsewhere.  Most agreements are for private hospitals (including nurses), large private sector employers such as Ramsey and pathology/radiology services. There appear to be some local government services (primarily Victoria and Tasmania) and not for profits such as the Red Cross.

The  SCHADS agreements are primarily the larger not for profits, local government and State government (Victoria) in the disability and social services sectors. There do not appear to be many agreements for smaller private sector providers especially in the home care sector who are contracted to provide NDIS support.

Aged care agreements cover nurses, support and administrative staff. While there are a large number of agreements in this sector, these are predominantly for the larger providers such as BUPA and religious organisations; there do not appear to be many agreements for smaller private sector providers.

During the course of the conference a number of parties expressed views about the coverage and application of some of the awards mentioned at [2] above. Those parties are asked to confirm their views, in writing, to [email protected] as soon as practicable.

[9] This matter will be relisted for a further conference after the ACTU has advised my chambers that the unions are in a position to propose a timetable.

PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<PR718275>

 1   [2020] FWCFB 1837

 2   [2020] FWCFB 1837 at [59]

 3   [2020] FWCFB 1905

Details
AGLC
Health Sector Awards – Pandemic Leave [2020] FWC 1956
Case
[2020] FWC 1956
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Fair Work Commission presided over a case involving the Health Sector Awards and Pandemic Leave, specifically focusing on varying modern awards to address the unique circumstances of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The matter was initiated by submissions from the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation (ANMF), Health Services Union (HSU), and Australian Pharmacy Employees’ Superannuitants’ Association (APESMA) regarding the specific needs of health care workers. The awards in question included the Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services Award 2010, Aged Care Award 2010, Ambulance and Patient Transport Industry Award 2010, Health Professionals and Support Services Award 2010, Medical Practitioners Award 2010, Nurses Award 2010, Pharmacy Industry Award 2010, Social, Community, Home Care and Disability Services Industry Award 2010, and Supported Employment Services Award 2010.

The legal issues before the Commission involved determining the coverage and application of these awards, particularly in light of enterprise agreements and jurisdictional considerations. The Commission needed to address whether these awards applied uniformly across states and territories and how they interacted with existing enterprise agreements. The Commission also had to consider the process for handling the claims made by the unions, ensuring that the modifications aligned with the objectives of the Fair Work Act 2009.

In addressing these issues, the Commission convened a conference with relevant stakeholders, including union representatives and employer associations. The conference aimed to clarify the scope of the awards and the nature of the claims. The Commission noted the complexity of the health sector agreements, identifying sub-groups such as the aged care industry, ambulance and patient transport, health and welfare services, and social, community, home care, and disability services. The Commission directed that a separate process would be established to address the specific needs of health care workers, with the ACTU coordinating the unions' claims and proposing a timetable for the hearing and determination of these claims. The Commission planned to relist the matter for a further conference once the unions had established a proposed timetable.

The outcome of the conference resulted in the establishment of a dedicated webpage on the Commission’s website for updates on the health sector awards and pandemic leave. The Commission also confirmed that it would relist the matter for further discussion after receiving the proposed timetable from the ACTU. This decision aimed to ensure that the specific needs of health care workers during the pandemic would be adequately addressed through the modification of relevant awards.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.