Health Ombudsman v Mullins

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


CITATION:

Health Ombudsman v Mullins [2019] QCAT 339

PARTIES: HEALTH OMBUDSMAN

(applicant)

v

SIAN LOUISE MULLINS

(respondent)

APPLICATION NO/S:

OCR027-19

MATTER TYPE:

Occupational regulation matters

DELIVERED ON:

30 October 2019 (ex tempore)

HEARING DATE:

On the papers

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Judge Allen QC, Deputy President

Assisted by:
Ms A Bains
Dr K Forrester
Dr A Tuckett

ORDERS:

1. Pursuant to section 107(2)(b)(iii) of the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (Qld), the Tribunal decides that the respondent has behaved in a way that constitutes professional misconduct;

2. Pursuant to section 107(3)(a) of the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (Qld), the respondent is reprimanded; and

3.   Each party must bear the party’s own costs for the proceeding.

CATCHWORDS:

PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS – NURSES – DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS – where the applicant instituted disciplinary proceedings against the respondent in relation to  conduct that involved the respondent stealing pre-authorised prescription sheets from her employer, and using them to obtain medications –  where the respondent was convicted of stealing, fraud and forgery and uttering in relation to the conduct – where at the time of the conduct the respondent was suffering a substance use disorder involving opiates that arose in the context of a long history of physical health problems - where the respondent self-notified to the Office of the Health Ombudsman and is remorseful – where the respondent has demonstrated insight and has sought and received ongoing treatment – where the respondent’s registration is subject to conditions - where the parties agree as to the facts – where the parties agree as to the sanction – whether the sanction proposed is appropriate

Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (Qld), s 103, s 104, s 107
Health Practitioner Regulation National Law  (Queensland), s 5

REPRESENTATION:

Applicant:

The Director of Proceedings, on behalf of the Health Ombudsman

Respondent:

Self-represented

APPEARANCES:

This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. The Director of Proceedings on behalf of the Health Ombudsman (“the applicant”), has referred a health service complaint against Sian Louise Mullins (“the respondent”) to the Tribunal pursuant to sections 103(1)(a) and 104 of the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (“HO Act”).  The applicant seeks a finding that the respondent has behaved in a way that constitutes professional misconduct and consequent orders for sanction. 

  2. The parties are agreed as to the facts of the matter, including the facts of the conduct, its characterisation as professional misconduct, and jointly submit that an appropriate order for sanction is one of a reprimand.

  3. The respondent is 30 years of age, born on [redacted], and was aged 27 years at the time of the conduct.  The respondent first obtained registration as a registered nurse on 28 December 2011.  From August 2014, the respondent was employed as a registered nurse in the emergency department of a South East Queensland public hospital (“the Hospital”).  The…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Health Ombudsman v Mullins and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] QCAT 339
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Health Ombudsman brought disciplinary proceedings against the respondent, a nurse, in relation to conduct that involved the respondent stealing pre-authorised prescription sheets from her employer and using them to obtain medications. The respondent was convicted of stealing, fraud and forgery and uttering in relation to the conduct. At the time of the conduct, the respondent was suffering a substance use disorder involving opiates that arose in the context of a long history of physical health problems. The respondent self-notified to the Office of the Health Ombudsman and expressed remorse. The respondent has demonstrated insight and has sought and received ongoing treatment. The respondent’s registration is subject to conditions. The parties agree as to the facts and the sanction.

The primary legal issue for the court was whether the sanction proposed by the parties was appropriate. The court considered the nature of the conduct, the respondent's remorse, insight and ongoing treatment, and the fact that the respondent's registration was already subject to conditions. The court noted that the respondent's conduct was serious and that disciplinary proceedings were necessary to protect the public and maintain public confidence in the nursing profession. However, the court also noted that the respondent had taken steps to address her substance use disorder and had expressed remorse. The court concluded that the proposed sanction of a reprimand was appropriate.

The Tribunal decided that the respondent had behaved in a way that constituted professional misconduct and that the respondent be reprimanded. The Tribunal also ordered that each party bear their own costs for the proceeding. The Tribunal's decision was based on the facts of the case, the parties' agreement as to the sanction, and the need to balance the need to protect the public with the respondent's remorse, insight and ongoing treatment. The Tribunal's decision demonstrates the importance of taking a nuanced approach to disciplinary proceedings, particularly where the respondent has taken steps to address their conduct and has expressed remorse.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to section 107(2)(b)(iii) of the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (Qld), the Tribunal decides that the respondent has behaved in a way that constitutes professional misconduct;

2. Pursuant to section 107(3)(a) of the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (Qld), the respondent is reprimanded; and

3. Each party must bear the party’s own costs for the proceeding.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.