QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION:
Health Ombudsman v Britten [2020] QCAT 217
PARTIES: DIRECTOR OF PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF THE HEALTH OMBUDSMAN (applicant)
v
VERITY EVE BRITTEN (respondent)
APPLICATION NO/S:
OCR131-19
MATTER TYPE:
Occupational regulation matters
DELIVERED ON:
26 May 2020 (ex tempore)
HEARING DATE:
26 May 2020
HEARD AT:
Brisbane
DECISION OF:
Judicial Member Robertson
Assisted by:
Ms A Bains
Ms H Barker
Mr J McNabORDERS: 1. The Tribunal finds, in respect of allegation 1, that the respondent engaged in professional misconduct.
2. The Tribunal finds, with respect to allegation 2, that the respondent engaged in unprofessional conduct.
3. The Tribunal orders that the respondent be reprimanded.
4. The Tribunal orders, pursuant to s 107(4)(a) of the Act, that the respondent is disqualified from applying for registration for a period of six months from today’s date.
5. The respondent is prohibited from providing any health service, whether on a paid or voluntary basis, unless and until such time as she is registered as a nurse under s 107(4)(b)(i) of the Act.
6. Each party bear their own costs.
CATCHWORDS: PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS – NURSES – DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS – Professional misconduct – unprofessional conduct – where registered nurse convicted of one count of stealing as a servant and three charges of possession of cannabis and one charge each of possessing utensils used to administer dangerous drugs and failing to properly dispose of syringes – where failure to notify the board within seven days of being charged with criminal offences – where plea of guilty and cooperation with the Health Ombudsman – characterisation of conduct – whether the respondent is disqualified from applying for registration.
Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (Queensland) s 5, s 130
Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (Qld) s 107
APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:
Applicant:
Director of Proceedings on behalf of the Health Ombudsman
Respondent:
Appeared on her own behalf
REASONS FOR DECISION
On the 30th of April 2019, the applicant Director referred these disciplinary proceedings to the Tribunal pursuant to s 103(1)(a) and s 104 of the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (The Act).
It is common ground that, at all material times, the respondent was registered under the National Law as a registered nurse with the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia; a health service provider within the meaning of s 8(a) (i) of the Act, and a health practitioner under the national law; and subject to Codes approved by the Board, including the Code of Professional Conduct for Nurses in Australia and the Code of Ethics for Nurses in Australia.
The parties have signed and filed an agreed statement of facts dated the 18th of September 2019.
The respondent was aged 32 years at the time of the conduct which forms the basis of these disciplinary proceedings.
She has a Bachelor of Nursing degree, which she obtained in 2015. She was first granted general registration by the Board in November 2015. Apart from the current referral, she has no known…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Health Ombudsman v Britten and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] QCAT 217
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Tribunal found that the respondent had indeed engaged in professional misconduct with respect to allegation 1 and unprofessional conduct in relation to allegation 2. The Tribunal reasoned that the respondent's criminal convictions, coupled with her failure to notify the board within the required timeframe, demonstrated a serious breach of the professional standards expected of a registered nurse. The Tribunal also considered the respondent's plea of guilty, her cooperation with the Health Ombudsman, and her otherwise unblemished record in reaching its decision. As a result, the Tribunal ordered that the respondent be reprimanded and disqualified from applying for registration for a period of six months from the date of the decision. Additionally, the respondent was prohibited from providing any health services unless and until she was registered as a nurse.
In conclusion, the Tribunal issued several orders against the respondent. Firstly, the Tribunal found that the respondent had engaged in professional misconduct and unprofessional conduct. Secondly, the Tribunal ordered that the respondent be reprimanded. Thirdly, the Tribunal disqualified the respondent from applying for registration for a period of six months. Fourthly, the Tribunal prohibited the respondent from providing any health services unless and until she was registered as a nurse. Lastly, each party was ordered to bear their own costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The Tribunal finds, in respect of allegation 1, that the respondent engaged in professional misconduct.
2. The Tribunal finds, with respect to allegation 2, that the respondent engaged in unprofessional conduct.
3. The Tribunal orders that the respondent be reprimanded.
4. The Tribunal orders, pursuant to s 107(4)(a) of the Act, that the respondent is disqualified from applying for registration for a period of six months from today’s date.
5. The respondent is prohibited from providing any health service, whether on a paid or voluntary basis, unless and until such time as she is registered as a nurse under s 107(4)(b)(i) of the Act.
6. Each party bear their own costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.