Hayward & Anor v LJ Hooker Longreach

Link copied
Case Copied 16 min read
CITATION: Hayward & Anor v LJ Hooker Longreach[2013] QCATA 221
PARTIES: Douglas Ross Hayward
Rosalie Anne Frost
(Appellants)
v
LJ Hooker Longreach
(Respondent)
APPLICATION NUMBER: APL104-13
MATTER TYPE: Appeals
HEARING DATE: On the papers
HEARD AT: Brisbane
DECISION OF: Justice Alan Wilson, President
DELIVERED ON: 5 August 2013
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE:

1.   Leave to appeal granted.

2.   The decision of 14 January 2013 is confirmed.

3.   Appeal dismissed.

CATCHWORDS:

APPEAL – LEAVE TO APPEAL – MINOR CIVIL DISPUTE – RESIDENTIAL TENANCY – where applicants entered into tenancy agreement for property managed by the respondent – where applicant’s position in the Queensland Public Service was made redundant – where the applicant was offered new position in a different city – where applicants gave notice of intention to leave and vacated the property – where condition of applicant’s employment provided for reimbursement of expenses and other costs associated with relocation – where applicants applied for termination of tenancy agreement on grounds of excessive hardship under s 310 of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 – where Tribunal found applicants would not suffer excessive hardship if tenancy agreement was not terminated – where applicants seek to appeal that decision – whether applicants established grounds for excessive hardship – whether leave to appeal should be granted

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – NATURAL JUSTICE – BIAS – where Magistrate referred to lessor as the ‘innocent landlord in this matter’ – whether comments amount to reasonable bias – whether breach of natural justice

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):

This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009.

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. Douglas Hayward and his partner Rosalie Frost were tenants in a house at Bluebird Court, Longreach which was managed, for its owner, by LJ Hooker Longreach. The tenancy agreement was for a fixed term between 21 December 2011 and 20 December 2012. The weekly rent was $420.00, and the rental bond was $1680.00.

  2. In August 2012, Mr Hayward’s position in the Queensland Public Service was made redundant. Shortly after that time he was offered a new position with the Public Service in Townsville. However, acceptance of that position meant he was required to move to Townsville as early as late September.

  3. LJ Hooker Longreach was given a notice of intention of leave without grounds dated 24 September 2012. The notice shows Mr Hayward and Ms Frost intended to give up vacant possession on 26 October 2012 (‘the handover date’).

  4. Section 277 of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008 (‘RTRA Act’) sets out the ways in which a tenancy agreement ends. Those circumstances include where the tenant gives a notice of intention to leave the premises to the lessor; and hands over vacant possession of the premises on or after the handover day.[1]

    [1]RTRA Act s 277(3).

  5. There are minimum notice periods which must be given. If a notice is given without grounds for a fixed term agreement,…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Hayward & Anor v LJ Hooker Longreach and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2013] QCATA 221
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicants, Hayward and another, appealed against a decision of the Magistrates Court which dismissed their application to terminate a residential tenancy agreement. The property in question was managed by LJ Hooker Longreach, the respondent. The applicants argued that they would suffer excessive hardship if the tenancy agreement was not terminated, and they sought leave to appeal the decision of the Tribunal which found otherwise. The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicants had established grounds for excessive hardship under section 310 of the Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation Act 2008. Additionally, the court needed to determine whether the Magistrate's comments about the lessor as the "innocent landlord in this matter" amounted to a breach of natural justice and reasonable bias.

The court examined the applicants' circumstances, including the redundancy of one of the applicants' positions in the Queensland Public Service, and their subsequent relocation to a new position in a different city. The court acknowledged the condition of the applicants' employment that provided for reimbursement of expenses and other costs associated with relocation. However, the court found that the applicants had not established excessive hardship as they were able to secure new employment in a different city and were not facing financial hardship as a result of the relocation. The court also determined that the Magistrate's comments did not amount to a breach of natural justice or reasonable bias. As a result, the court granted leave to appeal but dismissed the appeal and confirmed the decision of the Magistrates Court.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Leave to appeal granted. 2. The decision of 14 January 2013 is confirmed. 3. Appeal dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.