Haykal v Krawiec

[2014] HCASL 49

HAYKAL

v

KRAWIEC & ANOR

[2014] HCASL 49
S175/2013

1. The applicant applies for special leave to appeal from the orders of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia (Coleman, Ainslie-Wallace and Ryan JJ) delivered on 19 March 2013 dismissing an appeal against the making of an indemnity costs order. 

2. The applicant does not have legal representation and his application falls to be dealt with under r 41.10 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth) ("the Rules").

3. The application filed on 12 September 2013 is almost five months out of time. Compliance with the Rules respecting time should not be dispensed with. The prolix grounds of appeal and written case do not disclose any arguable basis of challenge to the decision of the Full Court.

4. The application is dismissed.

5. Pursuant to r 41.10.5 we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

V.M. Bell
12 March 2014 S.J. Gageler