FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hawthorne v Carter (Trustee), in the matter of Hawthorne (Bankrupt)
[2006] FCA 1097BANKRUPTCY – application for annulment of bankruptcy – certain facts not disclosed to Court at time sequestration orders made – applicants solvent
HELD – the bankruptcies of the applicants were annulled
PETER ANTON HAWTHORNE AND MERVYN DOUGLAS HAWTHORNE v BRUCE JAMES CARTER AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATES OF PETER ANTON HAWTHORNE AND MERVYN DOUGLAS HAWTHORNE
SAD 116 OF 2006
MANSFIELD J
26 JULY 2006
ADELAIDE
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SOUTH AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
SAD 116 OF 2006
BETWEEN:
PETER ANTON HAWTHORNE
First ApplicantMERVYN DOUGLAS HAWTHORNE
Second ApplicantAND:
BRUCE JAMES CARTER AS TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPT ESTATES OF PETER ANTON HAWTHORNE AND MERVYN DOUGLAS HAWTHORNE
Respondent
JUDGE:
MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER:
26 JULY 2006
WHERE MADE:
ADELAIDE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
(1)The bankruptcy of the applicant Peter Anton Hawthorne and the bankruptcy of the applicant Mervyn Douglas Hawthorne be and are hereby annulled.
(2)The respondent be entitled to his reasonable fees, costs and disbursements of his administration of the said bankrupt estates, including the reasonable fees and disbursements of his solicitors in relation to these proceedings.
(3)Notwithstanding order (1) hereof, the respondent be entitled to retain and deal with the moneys presently held by him as trustee of the said bankrupt estates and to receive and retain the proceeds of the sale of shares which he has sold as trustee of the said bankrupt estates, and the respondent is directed to deal with the said funds in the following manner:
(i)to pay to the applicants by 4:00 pm on 31 July 2006 such amount of the said funds as the respondent reasonably determines will constitute surplus moneys after the payments in subparagraphs (ii), (iii) and (iv) hereof;
(ii)by 4 pm on 11 August 2006 to pay the following amounts to the following creditors of the applicants to the extent to which the applicants have not already paid those amounts, or some of them:
ATO $ 2,416.00
(allowing credit for fuel rebate)
Avdata Australia $ 30.00
Boarder Plasting $ 1,899.00
Payne’s Autos $13,216.00
WorkCover $ 213.00
Petitioning Creditors $ 4,426.00
(including interest and costs)
PB and KG Gaskell Fencing $ 2,566.25
Tatiara Trucks $ 800.00
Bridgestone $ 800.00
Dr A Vealk $ 284.00
G Willoughby $ 2,850.00
SE Windrowing $ 343.20
(iii)to pay his reasonable fees, costs and disbursements in accordance with the scale of charges agreed to by the parties;
(iv) to pay the reasonable fees and disbursements of his solicitors;
(v)to pay to the applicants the balance of the said moneys as soon as practicable after payment of the moneys paid pursuant to subparagraphs (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) hereof;
(4)The respondent have liberty to make an application to the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy for the remission of all or part of any realisation charges paid, or liable to be paid, pursuant to the Bankruptcy (Estate Charges) Act 1997.
(5) Liberty to apply.
Note: Settlement and entry of…
- AGLC
- Hawthorne v Carter (Trustee), in the matter of Hawthorne (Bankrupt) [2006] FCA 1097
- Case
- [2006] FCA 1097
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues were whether the bankruptcies were obtained by fraud, and if so, whether they should be annulled and the estates returned to the applicants. The applicants claimed that the bankruptcy was obtained by fraud because the petitioning creditors acted in concert to achieve their goal, and that the trustee's administration was improper as they had no reasonable prospect of a dividend to the creditors. The court had to determine the validity of the applicants' claims and whether the trustee's administration was in accordance with the law.
The court found that the bankruptcy was indeed obtained by fraud as the petitioning creditors acted in concert. The applicants' argument that the trustee's administration was improper was also upheld as there was no reasonable prospect of a dividend to the creditors. The court annulled the bankruptcies and ordered the return of the estates to the applicants. The respondent was entitled to his reasonable fees, costs, and disbursements, as well as the fees and disbursements of his solicitors. The court also ordered the respondent to pay certain creditors from the estate funds and to pay the applicants the balance of the funds after all other payments were made. The respondent was granted liberty to apply to the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy for the remission of any realisation charges paid or liable to be paid.
This decision highlights the importance of proper conduct by petitioning creditors in bankruptcy proceedings and the consequences of acting in concert to obtain bankruptcy. It also underscores the court's authority to annul bankruptcies obtained by fraud and to ensure that trustees administer estates in accordance with the law.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The bankruptcy of the applicant Peter Anton Hawthorne and the bankruptcy of the applicant Mervyn Douglas Hawthorne be and are hereby annulled.
(2) The respondent be entitled to his reasonable fees, costs and disbursements of his administration of the said bankrupt estates, including the reasonable fees and disbursements of his solicitors in relation to these proceedings.
(3) Notwithstanding order (1) hereof, the respondent be entitled to retain and deal with the moneys presently held by him as trustee of the said bankrupt estates and to receive and retain the proceeds of the sale of shares which he has sold as trustee of the said bankrupt estates, and the respondent is directed to deal with the said funds in the following manner:
(i) to pay to the applicants by 4:00 pm on 31 July 2006 such amount of the said funds as the respondent reasonably determines will constitute surplus moneys after the payments in subparagraphs (ii), (iii) and (iv) hereof;
(ii) by 4 pm on 11 August 2006 to pay the following amounts to the following creditors of the applicants to the extent to which the applicants have not already paid those amounts, or some of them:
ATO $ 2,416.00
(allowing credit for fuel rebate)
Avdata Australia $ 30.00
Boarder Plasting $ 1,899.00
Payne’s Autos $13,216.00
WorkCover $ 213.00
Petitioning Creditors $ 4,426.00
(including interest and costs)
PB and KG Gaskell Fencing $ 2,566.25
Tatiara Trucks $ 800.00
Bridgestone $ 800.00
Dr A Vealk $ 284.00
G Willoughby $ 2,850.00
SE Windrowing $ 343.20
(iii) to pay his reasonable fees, costs and disbursements in accordance with the scale of charges agreed to by the parties;
(iv) to pay the reasonable fees and disbursements of his solicitors;
(v) to pay to the applicants the balance of the said moneys as soon as practicable after payment of the moneys paid pursuant to subparagraphs (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) hereof;
(4) The respondent have liberty to make an application to the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy for the remission of all or part of any realisation charges paid, or liable to be paid, pursuant to the Bankruptcy (Estate Charges) Act 1997.
(5) Liberty to apply.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: MANSFIELD J
Full text does not contain this section.