Harwood Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council

Case [2006] NSWLEC 523



Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Harwood Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council [2006] NSWLEC 523
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Harwood Pty Ltd

RESPONDENT
Sydney City Council
FILE NUMBER(S): 10346 of 2006
CORAM: Tuor C
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- Order under s 121B-6
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1975
DATES OF HEARING: 11/08/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 08/11/2006
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANT
Mr A Booth, solicitor

RESPONDENT
Mr M Fozzard, agent



JUDGMENT:

      THE LAND AND
      ENVIRONMENT COURT
      OF NEW SOUTH WALES

      Tuor C

      11 August 2006

      10346 of 2006 Harwood Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council

      JUDGMENT

1 This is an appeal against an order under s121B-6 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (the order). The order was issued by the Sydney City Council (the Council) on 5 April 2006 for premises at 71 Elizabeth Bay Road, Elizabeth Bay (the site).

2 The Applicant has obtained expert evidence from Mr Trevor Howse. In response to this advice the parties have agreed on amendments to the wording of the order and are seeking Consent orders from the Court.

3 On the basis of the information placed before the Court I am satisfied that the issues in the Statement of Issues have been resolved and that the consent orders may be issued.


4 The orders of the Court by consent are:


          1) The appeal is upheld.
          2) Pursuant to s 121(ZK) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 the terms and the period for compliance the respondent’s order dated 5 April 2006 are modified as set out in Annexure ‘A’.
          3) The exhibits are retained.

          It is noted that each party is to pay its own costs of the appeal.
      ___________________
      Annelise Tuor
          Commissioner of the Court
          rjs
Details
AGLC
Harwood Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council [2006] NSWLEC 523
Case
[2006] NSWLEC 523
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, Harwood Pty Ltd brought an appeal against an order issued by the Sydney City Council. The order in question was made under section 121B-6 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1975 and related to premises at 71 Elizabeth Bay Road. The Applicant sought to overturn the order and argued that it was not in accordance with the provisions of the Act or the relevant planning instruments.

The court was required to determine whether the order issued by the Sydney City Council was valid and whether it complied with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1975. The court had to consider the evidence presented by the parties and the expert advice provided by Mr Trevor Howse. The court also had to determine whether the consent orders proposed by the parties were appropriate and whether they resolved the issues in the Statement of Issues.

The court found that the issues in the Statement of Issues had been resolved and that the consent orders proposed by the parties were appropriate. The court accepted the expert evidence provided by Mr Trevor Howse and was satisfied that the terms and period for compliance in the order issued by the Sydney City Council were modified as set out in Annexure ‘A’. The court noted that each party was to pay its own costs of the appeal. The court issued orders upholding the appeal, modifying the terms and period for compliance in the order, and retaining the exhibits.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.