Hartmut Frigger & Anor v Clavey Legal Pty Ltd

[2017] HCASL 98

HARTMUT FRIGGER & ANOR

v

CLAVEY LEGAL PTY LTD
[2017] HCASL 98
P3/2017

1. The applicants require an extension of time, but it would be futile to grant the extension which is sought. 

2. The application for special leave to appeal does not raise a question of general importance.  None of the applicants' proposed appeal grounds enjoys sufficient prospects of success to warrant a grant of special leave.  There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Western Australia (Martin CJ, Buss P and Murphy JA).  Special leave should be refused.

3. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

G.A.A. Nettle
3 May 2017 M.M. Gordon