FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Harroun & Galla [2021] FamCAFC 147
Appeal from: Galla & Harroun [2021] FCCA 576 Appeal number(s): EAA 26 of 2021 File number(s): PAC 3822 of 2020 Judgment of: AINSLIE-WALLACE J Date of judgment: 1 July 2021 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – APPEAL – DIVORCE Where the wife appeals a divorce order – Where the wife says the parties were never legally married – Whether there was a valid marriage –Where the respondent conceded that the appeal should be allowed – Where the appeal is allowed – Where costs certificates ordered. Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act1981 ss 6, 8 and 9
Cases cited: Cramer v Davies (1997) 72 ALJR 146
Warren v Coombes (1978-1979) 142 CLR 53
Division: Appeal Division Number of paragraphs: 16 Date of hearing: 1 July 2021 Place: Sydney The Applicant: In person ORDERS
EAA 26 of 2021
PAC 3822 of 2020APPEAL DIVISION OF THE FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MS HARROUN
Appellant
AND: MR GALLA
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
AINSLIE-WALLACE J
DATE OF ORDER:
1 JULY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The appeal be allowed.
2.The orders made on 23 February 2021 be set aside.
3.The proceedings be remitted for rehearing by another judge of the Federal Circuit Court.
4.That the Court grants to the appellant wife a costs certificate pursuant to the provisions s 9 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act1981 (Cth) being a certificate that, in the opinion of the Court, it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under that Act to the appellant in respect of the costs incurred by her in relation to the appeal.
5.That the Court grants to the respondent husband a costs certificate pursuant to the provisions of s 6 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act1981 (Cth) being a certificate that, in the opinion of the Court, it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under that Act to the respondent in respect of the costs incurred by him in relation to the appeal.
That the Court grants to each of the parties a costs certificate pursuant to the provisions of s 8 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act1981 (Cth) being a certificate that, in the opinion of the Court, it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under that Act to each of the parties in respect of the costs incurred by the appellant and respondent in relation to the rehearing of the application.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Harroun & Galla has been approved by…
Continue reading Harroun & Galla
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Harroun & Galla [2021] FamCAFC 147
- Case
- [2021] FamCAFC 147
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the marriage between the parties was valid and whether the Family Court had jurisdiction to make the divorce order. The court found that there were substantial grounds to question the validity of the marriage. The court noted that the marriage certificate was incomplete and that there were discrepancies in the evidence regarding the marriage ceremony. The court concluded that the Family Court did not have jurisdiction to make the divorce order as the marriage was not valid. The appeal was allowed, the divorce order was set aside, and the proceedings were remitted for rehearing by another judge.
The court ordered that the appeal be allowed and the orders made on 23 February 2021 be set aside. The proceedings were remitted for rehearing by another judge of the Federal Circuit Court. The court also granted costs certificates to both parties pursuant to the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth). The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Orders
Orders of the court
EAA 26 of 2021
PAC 3822 of 2020
APPEAL DIVISION OF THE FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
MS HARROUN
Appellant
AND:
MR GALLA
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
AINSLIE-WALLACE J
DATE OF ORDER:
1 JULY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be allowed.
2. The orders made on 23 February 2021 be set aside.
3. The proceedings be remitted for rehearing by another judge of the Federal Circuit Court.
4. That the Court grants to the appellant wife a costs certificate pursuant to the provisions s 9 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) being a certificate that, in the opinion of the Court, it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under that Act to the appellant in respect of the costs incurred by her in relation to the appeal.
5. That the Court grants to the respondent husband a costs certificate pursuant to the provisions of s 6 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) being a certificate that, in the opinion of the Court, it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under that Act to the respondent in respect of the costs incurred by him in relation to the appeal.
That the Court grants to each of the parties a costs certificate pursuant to the provisions of s 8 of the Federal Proceedings (Costs) Act 1981 (Cth) being a certificate that, in the opinion of the Court, it would be appropriate for the Attorney-General to authorise a payment under that Act to each of the parties in respect of the costs incurred by the appellant and respondent in relation to the rehearing of the application.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.