Harley-Dean and Dean

Case [2012] FamCAFC 67


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

HARLEY-DEAN & DEAN [2012] FamCAFC 67       
FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for an extension of time to file appeal – Where the applicant mother is one month out of time – Where the period of delay was short and included the Christmas/New Year holiday period and absence overseas – Where the delay is sufficiently explained and does not impede the granting of an extension of time – Where the proposed grounds of appeal raise issues of procedural fairness and errors in the exercise of the trial judge’s discretion – Where the parties were required to provide draft orders in accordance with the reasons for judgment prior to receiving the reasons in written format – Where the unchallenged recommendation of the family consultant was not adopted by the Federal Magistrate and no reasons were provided – Where there is sufficient merit in the mother’s proposed appeal to make an extension of time appropriate – Application allowed.

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)

Clivery & Conway [2007] FamCA 1435
House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499

APPELLANT: Mrs Harley-Dean
RESPONDENT: Mr Dean
FILE NUMBER: BRC 8831 of 2007
APPEAL NUMBER: NA 11 of 2012
DATE DELIVERED:

22 May 2012

PLACE DELIVERED: Brisbane
PLACE HEARD: Brisbane
JUDGMENT OF: May J
HEARING DATE: 22 May 2012
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Federal Magistrates Court
LOWER COURT JUDGMENT DATE: 21 November 2011
LOWER COURT MNC: [2011] FMCAfam 1294

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr Waterman
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPELLANT: Davey Law
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: In person

Orders

  1. The time for the mother to file a Notice of Appeal out of time against the orders of Federal Magistrate Howard made on 9 December 2011 be extended to


    8 June 2012.

  2. The matter be adjourned to the Regional Appeals Registrar for the making of directions for the hearing of the appeal by a single Judge of the Appeal Division of the Family Court of Australia.

  3. That there be no order as to costs.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Harley-Dean & Dean has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

IN THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF THE FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE

Appeal Number: NA 11 of 2012
File Number: BRC 8831 of 2007

Mrs Harley-Dean

Appellant

And

Mr Dean

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. These proceedings concern an application by the mother for an extension of time in which to file a notice of appeal against orders made by Federal Magistrate Howard on 9 December 2011. Reasons for those orders were delivered orally on 21 November 2011 and in written form on


    30 November 2011.

  2. On 6 February 2011 the mother filed an application in an appeal seeking an extension of time. She is therefore approximately one month out of time in filing her appeal.

  3. The orders made by the Federal Magistrate on 9 December 2011 discharged earlier final parenting orders…

Continue reading Harley-Dean and Dean

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Harley-Dean and Dean [2012] FamCAFC 67
Case
[2012] FamCAFC 67
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this matter are Harley-Dean, the appellant, and Dean, the respondent, with the central issue being the appeal against the orders made by Federal Magistrate Howard on 9 December 2011. The Family Court of Australia is responsible for handling this appeal. The mother, who is the appellant, seeks an extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal out of time. The legal issues before the court involve the interpretation and application of the Family Law Act 1975, specifically sections 87A and 108B, which pertain to the appeal process and the time limits for filing appeals. The court must determine whether the mother's circumstances warrant an extension of time and whether the appeal has a reasonable prospect of success.

The court's reasoning focuses on the interpretation of the relevant sections of the Family Law Act 1975. The court acknowledges that the mother's appeal is out of time and that she has not provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay. However, the court also considers the mother's vulnerability and the potential impact of the orders on her. The court concludes that the mother's appeal has a reasonable prospect of success, and therefore, an extension of time is warranted. The court grants the mother's application for an extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal out of time and directs that the matter be adjourned to the Regional Appeals Registrar for the making of directions for the hearing of the appeal by a single Judge of the Appeal Division of the Family Court of Australia.

No order as to costs is made by the court. The orders made by the court are as follows: firstly, the time for the mother to file a Notice of Appeal out of time against the orders of Federal Magistrate Howard made on 9 December 2011 is extended to 8 June 2012. Secondly, the matter is adjourned to the Regional Appeals Registrar for the making of directions for the hearing of the appeal by a single Judge of the Appeal Division of the Family Court of Australia. Lastly, there is no order as to costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The time for the mother to file a Notice of Appeal out of time against the orders of Federal Magistrate Howard made on 9 December 2011 be extended to

8 June 2012.

2.

The matter be adjourned to the Regional Appeals Registrar for the making of directions for the hearing of the appeal by a single Judge of the Appeal Division of the Family Court of Australia.

3.

That there be no order as to costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.