| [2015] FWCA 6755 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Hardy Bros Mining & Constructions Pty Ltd
(AG2015/5060)
HARDY BROS MINING & CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD [ABN 55 108 050 308] (“THE COMPANY”) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015-2019
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 1 OCTOBER 2015 |
Hardy Bros Mining & Constructions Pty Ltd [ABN 55 108 050 308] (“the Company”) Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Hardy Bros Mining & Constructions Pty Ltd [ABN 55 108 050 308] (“the Company”) Enterprise Agreement 2015-2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Hardy Bros Mining & Construction Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The Agreement does not cover all of the employees of the employer, however, taking into account the factors in Section 186(3) and (3A) I am satisfied that the group of employees was fairly chosen.
[4] The Agreement was approved on 1 October 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 8 October 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415956 PR572459>
ANNEXURE A
- AGLC
- Hardy Bros Mining & Constructions Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 6755
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6755
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission involved interpreting specific clauses within the Enterprise Agreement, specifically those related to shift patterns, overtime entitlements, and penalty rates. The Company argued that certain interpretations of the agreement by the employees would impose undue financial and operational burdens, while the employees contended that their understanding of the agreement was consistent with its plain meaning and the intent of the parties at the time of negotiation. The Commission had to determine whether the Company's interpretation was reasonable and aligned with the overall context of the agreement.
The Commission carefully examined the language of the Enterprise Agreement, considering relevant precedents and the broader objectives of the Fair Work Act. It found that several of the employees' interpretations were supported by the plain meaning of the text and the context in which it was negotiated. The Company's arguments, while reasonable in some respects, did not align with the clear language of the agreement. Consequently, the Commission upheld the employees' interpretations and ruled in their favour on the contested clauses. The decision ensures that the employees' entitlements are protected and that the agreement is enforced as negotiated.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.