Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Haramis v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 51923 [2023] NSWCATCD 15 Hearing dates: 13 December 2022 Date of orders: 6 March 2023 Decision date: 06 March 2023 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: P French, Senior Member Decision: (1) The Tsevrementzis Report is admitted into evidence.
(2) The Owners – Strata Plan No. 51923 must cause the carrying out of work to the common property pipework and party wall between Units 40 and 41 in accordance with the scope of work set out in the Soundblock quotation dated 7 April 2022 before 3 April 2023.
Catchwords: LAND LAW – Strata title – duty to maintain common property in a good and reasonable state of repair
Legislation Cited: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) – s 38
Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) – ss 106, 226, 232
Cases Cited: Seiwa Pty Ltd v Owners Strata Plan 35042 [2006] NSWSC 1157
The Owners-Strata Plan No 33368 v Gittins [2022] NSWCATAP 130
Vujica v TNM Roofing Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAP 305
Texts Cited: NCAT Procedural Direction 3: Expert Evidence
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dimitri Haramis (Applicant)
The Owners – Strata Plan No. 51923 (Respondent)Representation: Dimitri Haramis (Self-represented)
Joel McGrath, Strata Manager (Respondent)
File Number(s): SC 22/39455 Publication restriction: Nil
REASONS FOR DECISION
Introduction
-
This is an application by Dimitri Haramis (the Lot Owner) for an order pursuant to s 232 and 106(1) of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) (SSM Act) that would require the Owners - Strata Pan No. 51923 (the Owners Corporation) to carry out work to a common property party wall and its enclosed pipework to prevent or reduce noise transmission into the bedroom of his Lot from the bathroom of an adjoining Lot. This application was made to the Tribunal on 23 August 2022 (the application).
-
For the reasons set out following I am satisfied that the Lot Owner has established on his evidence that the Owners Corporation is in breach of the duty reposed in it by s 106(1) of the SSM Act with respect to the party wall and its enclosed pipework. This common property permits intolerable noise transmission into the bedroom of his Lot from the bathroom of the adjoining Lot. I have therefore made a work order that will require the Owners Corporation to carry out specified maintenance work to wall and pipework to remedy this breach.
Procedural history
-
The application was first listed before the Tribunal, differently constituted, for a Directions Hearing on 5 October 2022. The Lot Owner attended that listing of the application. There was no appearance on behalf of the Owners Corporation. At that hearing the applicant informed the Tribunal that all the documentary evidence he intended to rely on for the hearing was attached to his application and that this had been served on the Owners Corporation. Consequently, the Tribunal issued directions in relation to the filing of documentary evidence in response to the application…
Continue reading Haramis v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 51923
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Haramis v The Owners - Strata Plan No. 51923 [2023] NSWCATCD 15
- Case
- [2023] NSWCATCD 15
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the tribunal were whether the Owners Corporation had breached its statutory duty to maintain the common property in a good and serviceable state of repair, and if so, what orders should be made to rectify the situation. The tribunal considered whether the Owners Corporation had failed to exercise its function to maintain the common property as required by law, and if Mr. Haramis's complaints were valid. The tribunal also examined the evidence, including the Soundblock quotation dated 7 April 2022, which outlined the scope of work needed for the repairs.
The tribunal found that the Owners Corporation had indeed failed to maintain and repair the common property in a good and serviceable state of repair, as required by the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015. The tribunal noted that the evidence, including the Tsevrementzis Report and the Soundblock quotation, supported Mr. Haramis's claims. Consequently, the tribunal made orders requiring the Owners Corporation to carry out the necessary work to the common property pipework and party wall before 3 April 2023. The tribunal admitted the Tsevrementzis Report into evidence as part of its reasoning.
The tribunal's final orders required the Owners Corporation to ensure that the work to the common property pipework and party wall between units 40 and 41 was carried out in accordance with the scope of work set out in the Soundblock quotation dated 7 April 2022 before 3 April 2023. This decision underscores the importance of the Owners Corporation's duty to maintain and repair common property and highlights the tribunal's role in enforcing compliance with these statutory obligations.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The Tsevrementzis Report is admitted into evidence.
(2) The Owners – Strata Plan No. 51923 must cause the carrying out of work to the common property pipework and party wall between Units 40 and 41 in accordance with the scope of work set out in the Soundblock quotation dated 7 April 2022 before 3 April 2023.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Duty of Owners Corporation to maintain and repair property. An owners corporation for a strata scheme must properly maintain and keep in a state of good and serviceable repair the common property ... Orders to settle disputes or rectify complaints Orders relating to complaints and disputes: The Tribunal may, on application by an interested person … make an order to settle a complaint or dispute about any of the following: - Failure to exercise a function: For the purposes of this section, an owners corporation, strata committee or building management committee is taken not to have exercised a function if –