Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hansimikali v Bayside Council [2019] NSWLEC 1353 Hearing dates: 23-24 July 2019 Date of orders: 01 August 2019 Decision date: 01 August 2019 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development Application No. 2017/1161 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a four and five storey mixed use development at 1027-1043 Botany Road, Mascot, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.
(3) The exhibits, other than Exhibits 5, A, B and F, are returned.Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – mixed-use development – exceedance of the height of buildings development standard – whether the proposal is consistent with the desired future character of the locality – amenity of the adjoining low density residential dwellings Legislation Cited: Botany Bay Local Environmental Plan 2013
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Apartment DevelopmentCases Cited: Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 90
Futurespace Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council (2009) 169 LGERA 45
Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 118
RebelMH Neutral Bay Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [2019] NSWCA 130
Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446Texts Cited: Apartment Design Guide
Botany Bay Development Control Plan 2013Category: Principal judgment Parties: Manuel Hansimikali (Applicant)
Bayside Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Staunton (Applicant)
Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant)
J Cole, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/107141 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No. 2017/1161 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a four and five storey mixed-use development (the proposal) at 1027-1043 Botany Road, Mascot (the site) by Bayside Council (the Council).
-
The appeal was subject to conciliation on 16 November 2018, in accordance with the provisions of s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). As agreement was not reached during the conciliation phase, the conciliation conference was terminated on 27 November 2018, pursuant to s 34(4) of the LEC Act.
Issues
-
The Council’s contentions can be summarised as follows:
The form, scale and location of the proposal are incompatible with the desired future character of the locality because the proposal does not comply with the height of buildings development standard of 14m;
The site is on a boundary with the R2 Low Density Residential zone and should allow for a transition to the smaller scale of the R2 zone which is not achieved by the height of the proposal;
The proposal exceeds the maximum building height applicable to the site and the written request to vary the development standard is not well founded; and
The uppermost level fails to provide adequate visual privacy to the…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Hansimikali v Bayside Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2019] NSWLEC 1353
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue for the court to decide was whether the Bayside Council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful and whether the proposal complied with relevant planning instruments. This involved an examination of the proposal's conformity with the local environmental plan, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and adherence to planning policies and objectives.
The court found that the Bayside Council had failed to provide adequate reasons for their decision to refuse the development application, as required by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The court also determined that the proposal complied with the relevant planning instruments and objectives, including those related to the proximity to the airport. Consequently, the court held that the decision to refuse the development application was not lawful. The appeal was upheld, and the development application was approved subject to certain conditions.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development Application No. 2017/1161 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a four and five storey mixed use development at 1027-1043 Botany Road, Mascot, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.
(3) The exhibits, other than Exhibits 5, A, B and F, are returned.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.