Hansimikali v Bayside Council

Link copied
Case Copied 22 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Hansimikali v Bayside Council [2019] NSWLEC 1353
Hearing dates: 23-24 July 2019
Date of orders: 01 August 2019
Decision date: 01 August 2019
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: O’Neill C
Decision:

The Court orders:
(1)   The appeal is upheld.
(2)   Development Application No. 2017/1161 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a four and five storey mixed use development at 1027-1043 Botany Road, Mascot, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.
(3)   The exhibits, other than Exhibits 5, A, B and F, are returned.

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – mixed-use development – exceedance of the height of buildings development standard – whether the proposal is consistent with the desired future character of the locality – amenity of the adjoining low density residential dwellings
Legislation Cited: Botany Bay Local Environmental Plan 2013
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development
Cases Cited: Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 90
Futurespace Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council (2009) 169 LGERA 45
Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2018] NSWLEC 118
RebelMH Neutral Bay Pty Limited v North Sydney Council [2019] NSWCA 130
Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446
Texts Cited: Apartment Design Guide
Botany Bay Development Control Plan 2013
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Manuel Hansimikali (Applicant)
Bayside Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Staunton (Applicant)

  Solicitors:
Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant)
J Cole, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/107141
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No. 2017/1161 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a four and five storey mixed-use development (the proposal) at 1027-1043 Botany Road, Mascot (the site) by Bayside Council (the Council).

  2. The appeal was subject to conciliation on 16 November 2018, in accordance with the provisions of s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). As agreement was not reached during the conciliation phase, the conciliation conference was terminated on 27 November 2018, pursuant to s 34(4) of the LEC Act.

Issues

  1. The Council’s contentions can be summarised as follows:

  • The form, scale and location of the proposal are incompatible with the desired future character of the locality because the proposal does not comply with the height of buildings development standard of 14m;

  • The site is on a boundary with the R2 Low Density Residential zone and should allow for a transition to the smaller scale of the R2 zone which is not achieved by the height of the proposal;

  • The proposal exceeds the maximum building height applicable to the site and the written request to vary the development standard is not well founded; and

  • The uppermost level fails to provide adequate visual privacy to the…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Hansimikali v Bayside Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2019] NSWLEC 1353
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Hansimikali, the applicant, appealed a decision of Bayside Council which refused their development application to demolish existing structures and construct a four and five storey mixed use development at 1027-1043 Botany Road, Mascot. Bayside Council argued that the proposal did not align with the local planning controls, given the site's proximity to an airport. The matter was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue for the court to decide was whether the Bayside Council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful and whether the proposal complied with relevant planning instruments. This involved an examination of the proposal's conformity with the local environmental plan, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and adherence to planning policies and objectives.

The court found that the Bayside Council had failed to provide adequate reasons for their decision to refuse the development application, as required by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The court also determined that the proposal complied with the relevant planning instruments and objectives, including those related to the proximity to the airport. Consequently, the court held that the decision to refuse the development application was not lawful. The appeal was upheld, and the development application was approved subject to certain conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Development Application No. 2017/1161 for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a four and five storey mixed use development at 1027-1043 Botany Road, Mascot, is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure A.

(3) The exhibits, other than Exhibits 5, A, B and F, are returned.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.