QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
CITATION:
Hanrahan v Queensland Racing Integrity Commission [2025] QCATA 100
PARTIES:
BRONWYN HANRAHAN (applicant/appellant)
v
QUEENSLAND RACING INTEGRITY COMMISSION (respondent)
APPLICATION NO/S:
APL290-25
MATTER TYPE:
Appeals
DELIVERED ON:
31 October 2025
HEARING DATE:
On the papers
HEARD AT:
Brisbane
DECISION OF:
Senior Member Fitzpatrick
ORDERS:
The application for a stay of the decision of the Racing Appeals Panel made on 26 June 2025 is refused.
CATCHWORDS:
APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – PROCEDURE – QUEENSLAND – STAY OF PROCEEDINGS – GENERAL PRINCIPLES AS TO GRANT OR REFUSAL – where Stewards impose penalty of a fine and suspension of licence for 12 months – where suspension of licence charge suspended wholly for two years conditional upon good behaviour – where applicant cannot obtain her licence until the fine is paid or payment plan is entered into – whether a monetary fine falls within the definition of “disqualification action” under the Racing Integrity Act2016 (Qld) – whether the Appeal Tribunal can grant a stay of the decision of the Stewards
Acts Interpretation Act 1954 (Qld), s 14B
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), s 145
Racing Integrity Act2016 (Qld), s 252AA, s 252AH, s 252AU, sch 1
Associated Newpapers Ltd v Wavish (1956) 96 CLR 526
Day v Humphrey [2017] QCA 104
Gillespie v Ford (1978) 19 ALR 102APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION:
This matter was heard and determined on the papers pursuant to s 32 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act2009 (Qld)
Applicant:
Self-represented
Respondent:
E Ballard, solicitor
REASONS FOR DECISION
The applicant, Bronwyn Hanrahan, has filed an appeal against a decision of the Racing Appeals Panel made on 26 June 2025 pursuant to s 252AH of the Racing Integrity Act2016 (Qld) (‘RI Act’) – to confirm a racing decision of the Stewards to impose a penalty on Ms Hanrahan.
On 26 May 2025 the penalty imposed by the Stewards was:
(a)for charge one a fine of $6,000.00;
(b)for charges two and three a fine of $6,000.00 for each charge and a suspension of licence for a period of 12 months for each charge.
(c)the penalties for charges two and three suspended for a period of two years, conditional upon Ms Hanrahan not being found in breach of any matters relating to a prohibited substance during that time.
Ms Hanrahan seeks a stay of the Racing Appeals Panel’s decision.
To succeed in a stay application Ms Hanrahan must show a reasonably arguable case, that she would be materially disadvantaged without a stay, and that the balance of convenience favours the granting of a stay.[1]
[1]Day v Humphrey [2017] QCA 104 [6].
The application will be considered pursuant to s 145 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld) (‘QCAT Act’).
Submissions
The application stresses that Ms Hanrahan does not believe she should have to pay a $6,000.00 fine for “something I haven’t done”. Ms Hanrahan says she cannot obtain her…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Hanrahan v Queensland Racing Integrity Commission and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] QCATA 100
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the legislative framework and the relevant provisions of the Racing Integrity Act. It noted that a "disqualification action" was defined in the Act as an action that resulted in the disqualification of a participant from racing. The court held that a fine did not equate to disqualification and therefore did not fall within the definition of "disqualification action". Furthermore, the court found that the Appeal Tribunal did not have the jurisdiction to grant a stay in circumstances where the penalty did not involve disqualification. The court concluded that the application for a stay was not within the scope of the Tribunal's authority.
In light of the above findings, the court dismissed Hanrahan’s application for a stay of the decision of the Racing Appeals Panel. The court confirmed that the Tribunal could not grant a stay of the Stewards' decision as the fine did not constitute a "disqualification action" and the Tribunal lacked the jurisdiction to intervene in such matters.
Orders
Orders of the court
The application for a stay of the decision of the Racing Appeals Panel made on 26 June 2025 is refused.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.