MAGISTRATES COURTS OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
Hannan v Waggamba Medical Centre [2013] QMC 23
PARTIES:
ELYSE LEE HANNAN
(plaintiff)
v
WAGGAMBA MEDICAL CENTRE PTY LTD
(defendant)
FILE NO/S:
M2/13
DIVISION:
Magistrates Courts
PROCEEDING:
Employment Claim
ORIGINATING COURT:
Magistrates Court at Goondiwindi
DELIVERED ON:
8 November 2013
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
3 September 2013, 17 October 2013
MAGISTRATE:
Lee GC
ORDER:
The defendant employer pay the plaintiff $1119.74
CATCHWORDS:
INDUSTRIAL LAW – “Employment claim” – resignation of employee plaintiff – whether accrued annual leave upon termination – if so, recovery of accrued leave and annual leave loading – recovery of last week of wages
Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), s 16, s 20, s 55, s 56, s 59, s 61, s 87, s 90, s 535, s 536
Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth), r 3.31, r 3.44
Magistrates Courts Act 1921(Qld), s 42A, s 42BNurses Award 2010
Ryan v Whitehaven Coal Mining Pty Ltd, [2013] NSWLC 11 (26 July 2013)
COUNSEL:
K Crank for plaintiff
L Wilson (solicitor) for defendant
SOLICITORS:
Queensland Nursing Union for plaintiff
Doyle Wilson Solicitors for defendant
On 1 March 2013 the plaintiff commenced an “Employment claim” in this court pursuant to Part 5A of the Magistrates Courts Act 1921 (the Act)[1]claiming $5820.35 comprising $4188.81 accrued annual leave, associated leave loading of $733.04 and one weeks pay of $898.50 (gross)[2].
[1] Part 5A was inserted in to the Magistrates Courts Act 1921 by Part 6 of the Industrial Relations Act and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2007 (No 23 of 2007) with effect from 1 January 2008 (s 2(1));
[2] Amended Employment Claim dated and filed 7 August 2013;
In its defence the defendant opposed the claim in its entirety although during addresses at end of the trial conceded that part of the final week’s wages of $898.50 ie $448.50 remains owing[3]. The defendant had paid $450[4] by three $150 instalments after the plaintiff’s employment ceased[5]. That part of the claim therefore does not remain an issue although, as a trial, still had not been paid.
[3] At para [8] of affidavit of Practice manager Paul Jones conceded that $311.14 was owed. However, it appears he arrived at that figure by deducting the $450 from the net pay of $761.14;
[4] $898.50 less $450 = $448.50;
[5] Paragraphs 3 & 4 submissions for the defendant; para [8] affidavit of Paul Jones; exhibit B affidavit of the Plaintiff (her bank statements); exhibit 1 (original wages book);
There is no dispute that this is an “Employment Claim” as defined in Part 5A. The plaintiff was an employee of the defendant as a registered nurse. She commenced employment as a casual on 17 August 2010, became permanent full time on
12 January 2011[6] and resigned by letter dated 1 August 2012[7] effective 15 August 2012. Her annual wages were not more than $98000 per annum and that the claim arises out of, among other things, a breach of the Nurses Award 2010 made under the Fair Work Act 2009
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Hannan v Waggamba Medical Centre and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2013] QMC 23
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues addressed by the court were whether the plaintiff had accrued annual leave that remained unpaid upon her resignation, and if so, the amount due for these unpaid leave days and the associated loading. Additionally, the court had to determine whether the plaintiff was owed part of her last week's wages and, if so, the amount due, along with interest.
The court found that the plaintiff had not discharged the onus of proving, on the balance of probabilities, that she had 23.31 days of untaken accrued leave for which she had not been paid. The plaintiff's main evidence was a document contained in Exhibit "C" to her affidavit. However, the court was not satisfied with this evidence and concluded that the plaintiff had been paid for 37 out of the 39.31 days of annual leave. Therefore, there were 2.31 days (or 17.556 hours) of accrued annual leave for which she had not been paid. The court accepted that the plaintiff was also owed $448.50 which was part of her last week's wages. The total amount owed, including interest, was calculated to be $1119.74.
In conclusion, the court ordered the defendant employer to pay the plaintiff $1119.74. The court also noted that it would hear the parties regarding costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
The defendant employer pay the plaintiff $1119.74
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.