Hanley and Hanley
Case
•
[2014] FCCA 293
•25 February 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hanley and Hanley [2014] FCCA 293
[2014] FCCA 293
25 February 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned proceedings between Mr Hanley and Ms Hanley regarding the parental responsibility and time spent with their two children, [X] and [Y]. The decision was made by Judge Harman.
The court was required to determine the orders concerning parental responsibility, the time the children would spend with each parent, and provisions for communication, medical information, and school contact. Additionally, the court addressed the filing and service of evidence for an upcoming trial and the process for listing the matter for hearing.
Judge Harman ordered that prior interim orders concerning the children be discharged. Parental responsibility was to be shared by both parents, with the children spending time with Ms Hanley at all times other than when they were with Mr Hanley. Specific arrangements were detailed for Mr Hanley's time with the children, including alternate weekends and intervening weekdays during school terms, and a division of school holiday periods. The orders also stipulated communication rights, the exchange of medical and educational information, and the process for collecting the children. The court also set strict timelines for the filing and service of evidence by both parties and outlined the procedure for listing the matter for trial, including provisions for administrative vacation of a call-over date if the matter was certified as ready for hearing.
The court was required to determine the orders concerning parental responsibility, the time the children would spend with each parent, and provisions for communication, medical information, and school contact. Additionally, the court addressed the filing and service of evidence for an upcoming trial and the process for listing the matter for hearing.
Judge Harman ordered that prior interim orders concerning the children be discharged. Parental responsibility was to be shared by both parents, with the children spending time with Ms Hanley at all times other than when they were with Mr Hanley. Specific arrangements were detailed for Mr Hanley's time with the children, including alternate weekends and intervening weekdays during school terms, and a division of school holiday periods. The orders also stipulated communication rights, the exchange of medical and educational information, and the process for collecting the children. The court also set strict timelines for the filing and service of evidence by both parties and outlined the procedure for listing the matter for trial, including provisions for administrative vacation of a call-over date if the matter was certified as ready for hearing.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Hanley and Hanley [2014] FCCA 293
Most Recent Citation
BBF15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1177
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
7
Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles
[2001] NSWCA 305
R & R: Children's Wishes
[2000] FamCA 43
Johnson & Page
[2007] FamCA 1235