Hankinson & De Vries & Ors

Case [2013] FamCA 455


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

HANKINSON & DE VRIES AND ORS [2013] FamCA 455
FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – Practice and Procedure – Amendment to Initiating Application resulting in the joinder of Second and Third Respondents  – Where the First Respondent seeks Second and Third Respondents be removed as parties – Where the Second and Third Respondents are not persons whose participation “as a party” is necessary
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)
Wayne & Dillon and Anor (2008) FamCAFC 204
APPLICANT: Ms Hankinson
FIRST RESPONDENT: Mr A De Vries
SECOND RESPONDENT: Mr B De Vries
THIRD RESPONDENT: Mr C De Vries
FILE NUMBER: BRC 6542 of 2011
DATE DELIVERED: 12 June 2013
PLACE DELIVERED: Brisbane
PLACE HEARD: Brisbane
JUDGMENT OF: Kent J
HEARING DATE: 03 June 2013

REPRESENTATION

SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Zande Law
COUNSEL FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENT: Mr Hamwood
SOLICITOR FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENT: Charles Cooper Lawyers
FOR THE SECOND RESPONDENT:  No appearance
FOR THE THIRD RESPONDENT:  No appearance

Orders

IT IS ORDERED

  1. That the Second Respondent and the Third Respondent each be removed as a party to these proceedings.

  2. That within fourteen (14) days, the Applicant file and serve points of claim particularising each and every matter of fact the Applicant relies upon in support of the declaration sought in paragraph 2 of her amended initiating application.

  3. Within 14 days thereafter, the First Respondent file and serve points of defence particularising each and every matter of fact the First Respondent relies upon in defence of that claim.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED

  1. That the costs of and incidental to this application be reserved to the trial judge. 

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Hankinson & De Vries and Ors has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE

FILE NUMBER: BRC 6542 of 2011

Ms Hankinson

Applicant

And

Mr A De Vries

First Respondent

And

Mr B De Vries

Second Respondent

And

Mr C De Vries

Third Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. The substantive proceedings are for alteration of property interests pursuant to Part VIIIAB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) (“the Act”). The Applicant, Ms Hankinson, born in 1967 is 46 years of age. The First Respondent, Mr A De Vries was born in 1958 and is 54 years of age. The existence of a de facto relationship within the meaning of Part VIII AB is disputed by the First Respondent. He seeks a declaration that a de facto relationship never existed.

  2. By his response filed on 26 September 2011, the First Respondent seeks orders in the substantive proceedings for declarations to the effect that a de facto relationship never existed or, alternatively, did not exist for a period in excess of two years as required by Part VIIIAB.  In the alternative, he seeks findings to the effect that the applicant in the substantive proceedings did not make substantial…

Continue reading Hankinson & De Vries & Ors

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Hankinson & De Vries & Ors [2013] FamCA 455
Case
[2013] FamCA 455
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Hankinson & De Vries & Ors*, heard before Kent J, the applicant sought a declaration against the respondents. The proceedings involved an application to remove the Second and Third Respondents as parties.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Second and Third Respondents should be removed as parties to the proceedings. Ancillary to this, the court was required to determine the appropriate procedural steps for the remaining parties to particularise their claims and defences.

Kent J ordered the removal of the Second and Third Respondents as parties. The court further directed the applicant to file and serve points of claim within fourteen days, detailing the factual basis for the declaration sought in her amended initiating application. The First Respondent was then required to file and serve points of defence within a further fourteen days. The costs of this application were reserved to the trial judge.

Orders

Orders of the court

IT IS ORDERED

1.

That the Second Respondent and the Third Respondent each be removed as a party to these proceedings.

2.

That within fourteen (14) days, the Applicant file and serve points of claim particularising each and every matter of fact the Applicant relies upon in support of the declaration sought in paragraph 2 of her amended initiating application.

3.

Within 14 days thereafter, the First Respondent file and serve points of defence particularising each and every matter of fact the First Respondent relies upon in defence of that claim.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED

4.

That the costs of and incidental to this application be reserved to the trial judge.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.