| [2014] FWCA 7548 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Handley Surveys Pty Ltd
(AG2014/7100)
HANDLEY SURVEYS PTY LTD WHEATSTONE PROJECT AGREEMENT 2014
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 23 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for approval of the Handley Surveys Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Handley Surveys Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Handley Surveys Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[5] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[6] The Agreement was approved on 23 October 2014 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 30 October 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 22 October 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE410810 PR556983>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Handley Surveys Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 7548
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 7548
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court carefully examined the terms of the settlement agreement, considering whether it provided adequate compensation to the company and its members. The judge assessed the evidence regarding the former director's conduct and the extent of the company's losses. The court also evaluated whether the agreement was a genuine compromise and whether it was fair and reasonable in all the circumstances. The judge noted that the settlement was structured to provide a resolution that was proportionate to the company's losses and that it included provisions for the protection of the company's interests. The court concluded that the settlement was fair and reasonable and in the best interests of the company and its members.
After considering the evidence and arguments presented, the court approved the settlement agreement. The judge found that the terms of the agreement were fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of the company and its members. The court noted that the agreement provided a resolution that was proportionate to the company's losses and that it included adequate provisions for the protection of the company's interests. The court's approval allowed the settlement to proceed, providing a resolution to the dispute and allowing the company to move forward without further litigation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.