[2016] FWCA 2678
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement |
| Hamilton Elevators |
| (AG2016/699) |
HAMILTON ELEVATORS / ETU / AMWU / CONSTRUCTION &
SERVICE EMPLOYEES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015-2018
Building, metal and civil construction industries
| COMMISSIONER ROE | MELBOURNE, 29 APRIL 2016 |
Application for approval of the Hamilton Elevators / ETU / AMWU Construction & Service
Employees Enterprise Agreement 2015-2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
Hamilton Elevators / ETU / AMWU Construction & Service Employees Enterprise Agreement
2015-2018 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work
Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Hamilton Elevators. The Agreement is a single
enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to
this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union”
known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) and Communications,
Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of
Australia, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183
of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that
the Agreement covers the organisations.
[2016] FWCA 2678
[4] The Agreement was approved on 29 April 2016 and, in accordance with s.54, will
operate from 6 May 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 August 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code O, AE418745 PR579674>
- AGLC
- Hamilton Elevators [2016] FWCA 2678
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 2678
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement met the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission needed to determine if the agreement was fair and reasonable, had been negotiated in good faith, and was consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and the employer. The Commission examined the agreement's provisions, the bargaining process, and the parties' submissions to determine if the agreement met the required standards.
The Commission found that the agreement met all the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was fair and reasonable, had been negotiated in good faith, and was consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act. The Commission also found that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and the employer. The Commission noted that the agreement covered the relevant organisations and that the parties had given notice under section 183 of the Fair Work Act that they wanted the agreement to cover them. The Commission approved the agreement on 29 April 2016, and it will come into effect on 6 May 2016.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.