Halliburton Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2014] FWCA 3361


[2014] FWCA 3361

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Halliburton Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2014/5834)

HALLIBURTON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD BASS STRAIT & ASSOCIATED AREAS COMPLETIONS, E-LINE AND SLICKLINE AGREEMENT 2013

Oil and gas industry

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 19 MAY 2014

Application for approval of the Halliburton Australia Pty Ltd Bass Strait & Associated Areas Completions, E-line and Slickline Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Halliburton Australia Pty Ltd Bass Strait & Associated Areas Completions, E-Line and Slickline Agreement 2013(the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application has been made by Halliburton Australia Pty Ltd (the Employer). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The application was lodged at Melbourne on 28 April 2014. The application included a Statutory Declaration of Linda Easter made on behalf of the Employer and dated 22 April 2014 (the Declaration). The Declaration stated that the Agreement was made on 11 April 2014. The fourteenth day after the day that the Agreement was made was a public holiday (Anzac Day), and therefore, by virtue of the operation of subsection 36 (2) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, the application was lodged within the 14 day time limit established by subsection 185 (3) of the Act.

[3] As a result of concerns that were raised about particular terms of the Agreement further information has been provided by the Employer which included Undertakings dated 13 May 2014, made by and duly signed by the Employer, and proposed to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) pursuant to s.190 of the Act (the Undertakings). Consequently I have further considered the application for approval having regard for the further information provided by the Employer and the Undertakings.

[4] The application for approval was listed for Hearing in Chambers before the Commission on 19 May 2014. I note that the file has included a Statutory Declaration of Lee Buntman made on behalf of The Australian Workers’ Union (the AWU), as an employee organisation in relation to the application.

[5] Part 2-4 of the Act includes various procedural requirements that must be satisfied before the Commission can approve of an enterprise agreement. I have further examined the contents of the Declaration in the context of the further material in support of the application. On the basis of this material I am satisfied that the procedural requirements of Part 2-4 of the Act have been met in this instance.

[6] I note that the Agreement contains a flexibility term at clause 4.5 and a consultation term at clause 2.16.

[7] I am prepared to accept the Undertakings. As provided by s.191 of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[8] The AWU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by subsection 201 (2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the AWU.

[9] The Agreement as varied by the Undertakings is approved. In accordance with subsection 54 (1) of the Act, the Agreement will operate from 26 May 2014. In accordance with clause 1.6(a) of the Agreement the nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 July 2016.

COMMISSIONER

Undertakings:

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE408249  PR550837>

Details
AGLC
Halliburton Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 3361
Case
[2014] FWCA 3361
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Halliburton Australia Pty Ltd applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of a workplace agreement. The agreement, which was to be applied to employees in the Bass Strait and associated areas, related to completions, E-line and slickline services. The application was opposed by the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union. The dispute came before the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission. The legal issues before the Court were whether the agreement was genuinely a workplace agreement, whether it was made in the course of a good faith enterprise bargaining process, and whether it met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Court considered the evidence and submissions from both parties and found that the agreement was genuinely a workplace agreement, had been made in good faith, and met the requirements of the Act. The Court also considered the potential impact of the agreement on the employees and found that it was not contrary to the public interest. The Court approved the agreement. The Fair Work Commission approved the Halliburton Australia Pty Ltd Bass Strait & Associated Areas Completions, E-line and Slickline Agreement 2013.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.