Hall v Xhana Pty Ltd
[2016] FCCA 2001
•4 August 2016
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| HALL v XHANA PTY LTD | [2016] FCCA 2001 |
| Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – Setting aside bankruptcy notice by consent. |
| Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966, s.30 |
| Applicant: | DANNY GORDON HALL |
| Respondent: | XHANA PTY LTD |
| File Number: | SYG 3355 of 2015 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Dowdy |
| Hearing date: | 4 August 2016 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 4 August 2016 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 4 August 2016 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr K Tang of Counsel |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr McGrath |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Pateman Legal |
ORDERS OF THE COURT
That Bankruptcy notice BN186281 issued on 18 November 2015 be set aside.
The proceeding is otherwise dismissed.
That there be no order as to costs to the intent that each party bears his and its own costs.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 3355 of 2015
| DANNY GORDON HALL |
Applicant
And
| XHANA PTY LTD |
Respondent
EX TEMPORE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In this matter, by an amended application filed on 12 February 2016 the applicant, Mr Danny Hall, sought orders setting aside bankruptcy notice BN186281 issued on 18 November 2015 on the grounds that the bankruptcy notice was an abuse of process, and that he also had a counter-claim, set off, or cross-demand which exceeded the amount referred to in the bankruptcy notice.
To that amended application, the respondent creditor filed on 21 March 2016 a notice of opposition asserting that the bankruptcy notice was not an abuse of process and that the applicant debtor did not have a counter-claim, set-off or cross-demand exceeding the alleged debt. In those circumstances, the matter came before me on 9 June for hearing, but it was not ready to proceed and did not proceed for reasons which it is unnecessary for me to go into today, and the matter was adjourned for hearing on that date to today.
Yesterday, my Chambers received a form of short minutes of order that, whilst not expressed to be by consent, were clearly of a consensual nature and gave the relief sought by Mr Hall in his amended application other than an order for costs in his favour.
This morning, Mr Tang of Counsel has appeared for Mr Hall, and Mr McGrath has appeared for the respondent.
Mr Tang confesses that he has only very recently come into the matter, but he tells me that, as far as he understands his instructions, Mr Hall is content with these orders and asks that they be made, and I note that Mr Hall is at the back of the Court instructing Mr Tang directly. Both parties ask me to make these orders by consent. Whilst there is no express power to set aside a bankruptcy notice, such a power arises by necessary implication and is within the general powers of this Court as a Court of Bankruptcy conferred by s.30(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth).
The power to set aside a bankruptcy notice is a discretionary one, but as both parties ask me to make it and I am told there are no other reasons why I should not, I will do so.
Accordingly, by consent, I make the following orders:
a)Bankruptcy notice BN186281 issued on 18 November 2015 is set aside.
b)The proceeding is otherwise dismissed.
c)I make no order as to costs to the intent that each party bears their own costs.
I certify that the preceding seven (7) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Dowdy
Date: 4 August 2016
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
-
Causation
-
Damages
0
0
2