Haddcorp Pty LTD T/A Tamworth Telstra Store

Case

[2019] FWCA 3687

28 MAY 2019

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2019] FWCA 3687
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

Haddcorp Pty LTD T/A Tamworth Telstra Store
(AG2019/1468)

HADDCORP PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2009

Retail industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BULL

SYDNEY, 28 MAY 2019

Application for termination of the the Haddcorp Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2009.

[1] On 3 May 2019, HaddCorp Pty Ltd applied for the termination of the Haddcorp Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2009 (the Agreement), under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] The application pursuant to s.225 of the Act states:

225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b) an employee covered by the agreement;

(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.”

[3] The applicant is an employer covered by the Agreement and thus has standing to make the termination application. The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date of 30 September 2012.

[4] Section 226 of the Act sets out when the Commission must terminate an expired enterprise agreement where an application to terminate an agreement is made.

“226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

“If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

    (ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”

[5] The applicant’s statutory declaration by Ms Katherine Hayward states that 70 employees are covered by this Agreement.

[6] The Employee signatures provided in support of the termination of the Agreement are said by Ms Katherine Hayward as a cross section of employees covered by the Agreement.

[7] The Agreement does not cover any employee organisations.

[8] Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.

[9] The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE872542  PR708774>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0