Hadchiti v Roads and Maritime Services

Case

[2016] NSWLEC 1086

11 March 2016

No judgment structure available for this case.

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Hadchiti & Ors v Roads & Maritime Services [2016] NSWLEC 1086
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 4 December 2016
Date of orders: 11 March 2016
Decision date: 11 March 2016
Jurisdiction:Class 3
Before: Miller AC
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION FOLLOWING ACQUISITION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Karam Hadchiti (First Applicant)
Harba Hadchiti (Second Applicant)
Mirad Samir Chalfa (Third Applicant)
Mirad Samir Chalfa as Executor for the Estate of Mary-Anne Chalfa (Fourth Applicant)
Roads and Maritime Services (Respondent)
Representation: Mr Wertheim, Slater & Gordon Lawyers (Applicant)
Ms K Davis, Corrs Chambers Westgrath Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s):30858 of 2015
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.

…………….

Acting Commissioner Miller

30858 of 2015 (s34O) (74.6 KB, pdf)

30858 of 2015 Miller (C) (142 KB, pdf)

Decision last updated: 11 March 2016

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

2