GYK v Health Ombudsman

Link copied
Case Copied 15 min read

QUEENSLAND CIVIL AND
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL


CITATION:

GYK v Health Ombudsman [2025] QCAT 168

PARTIES:

GYK

(applicant)

v

HEALTH OMBUDSMAN

(respondent)

APPLICATION NO/S:

OCR094-24

MATTER TYPE:

Occupational regulation matters

DELIVERED ON:

15 July 2025

HEARING DATE:

7 May 2025

HEARD AT:

Brisbane

DECISION OF:

Judicial Member Rinaudo AM
Assisted by:
Mrs C McKenzie
Mr A Thompson
Mrs K Thomson

ORDERS:

IT IS THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL THAT:

1.   The Health Ombudsman’s decision on 7 March 2024 to suspend the applicant’s registration by way of immediate action is confirmed. 

2.   There be no order as to costs. 

THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT:

1. Until further order, pursuant to s 66(1) of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), publication of:

(a)     the contents of a document or other thing filed in or produced to the Tribunal;

(b)     evidence given before the Tribunal;

(c)     any order made or reasons given by the Tribunal;

is prohibited to the extent that it could identify or lead to the identification of the applicant and the complainants save as provided for by the terms of this order and save as is necessary for the parties to engage in and progress these proceedings, or any appeal or review arising from these proceedings, and for the respondent to provide information to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency or National Board in the exercise of the Health Ombudsman’s statutory functions under the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (Qld).

2.     Any material affected by the non-publication order shall not be copied or inspected without an order of the Tribunal, except by:

(a)     a judicial member;

(b)     a tribunal member;

(c)     an associate to a judicial officer or tribunal member appointed under relevant legislation;

(d)     any assessor appointed to assist the Tribunal;

(e)     the staff of the Tribunal registry;

(f)      any judicial officer, court staff or associate dealing with any appeal or review arising from these proceedings; or

(g)     the parties to these proceedings or any appeal or review arising from these proceedings.

CATCHWORDS:

PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS – OTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS – where the applicant was subject to immediate registration action by the Health Ombudsman owing to being charged with criminal offences – where the immediate registration action was imposed on the bases that because of the applicant’s conduct, the Health Ombudsman reasonably believes: he poses a serious risk to persons and it is necessary to take the action to protect public health or safety; and it is otherwise in the public interest – where the applicant seeks a review of the decision to suspend his registration – where the Tribunal is not persuaded that less onerous action could be taken to serve the purpose of the immediate registration action – whether the Tribunal should confirm the decision under review

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)

Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (Qld)
Health Practitioner Regulation National Law (Queensland)

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld)

I v Medical Board of Australia [2011] SAHPT 18

Liddell v Medical Board…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read GYK v Health Ombudsman and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2025] QCAT 168
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

GYK was subject to immediate registration action by the Health Ombudsman, due to charges of criminal offences against him. The Health Ombudsman imposed the action based on the belief that GYK posed a serious risk to the public and that the action was necessary to protect public health and safety. The applicant sought a review of the decision to suspend his registration. The court was required to decide whether the Tribunal should confirm the Health Ombudsman’s decision and whether less onerous action could be taken to serve the purpose of the immediate registration action. The court considered the statutory framework and the evidence presented. It concluded that the Tribunal was not persuaded that less onerous action could be taken to serve the purpose of the immediate registration action. The court found that the Health Ombudsman's decision was reasonable and in the public interest.

The Tribunal confirmed the Health Ombudsman’s decision to suspend GYK's registration by way of immediate action. The Tribunal also ordered that publication of the contents of documents, evidence, and orders be prohibited to the extent that it could identify or lead to the identification of GYK and the complainants. The order also restricted the copying and inspection of any material affected by the non-publication order. These measures were intended to protect the privacy of the parties while allowing the necessary parties to engage in and progress these proceedings, or any appeal or review arising from these proceedings. The Tribunal did not order costs for either party.

Orders

Orders of the court

IT IS THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL THAT:

1. The Health Ombudsman’s decision on 7 March 2024 to suspend the applicant’s registration by way of immediate action is confirmed.

2. There be no order as to costs.

THE TRIBUNAL ORDERS THAT:

1. Until further order, pursuant to s 66(1) of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 (Qld), publication of:

(a) the contents of a document or other thing filed in or produced to the Tribunal;

(b) evidence given before the Tribunal;

(c) any order made or reasons given by the Tribunal;

is prohibited to the extent that it could identify or lead to the identification of the applicant and the complainants save as provided for by the terms of this order and save as is necessary for the parties to engage in and progress these proceedings, or any appeal or review arising from these proceedings, and for the respondent to provide information to the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency or National Board in the exercise of the Health Ombudsman’s statutory functions under the Health Ombudsman Act 2013 (Qld).

2. Any material affected by the non-publication order shall not be copied or inspected without an order of the Tribunal, except by:

(a) a judicial member;

(b) a tribunal member;

(c) an associate to a judicial officer or tribunal member appointed under relevant legislation;

(d) any assessor appointed to assist the Tribunal;

(e) the staff of the Tribunal registry;

(f) any judicial officer, court staff or associate dealing with any appeal or review arising from these proceedings; or

(g) the parties to these proceedings or any appeal or review arising from these proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.