Gwydir Holdings Pty Ltd v Campbelltown Council

Case [2016] NSWLEC 1546


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Gwydir Holdings Pty Ltd v Campbelltown Council [2016] NSWLEC 1546
Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 28 October 2016
Date of orders: 21 November 2016
Decision date: 21 November 2016
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Morris C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Gwydir Holdings Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Campbelltown Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Dr J Smith (Applicant)

 

Solicitors:

  Mr A Seton
Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s):213119/2016
Publication restriction:No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans and documentation as the plans and documentation relied upon for the purpose of the development application:

Drawing Title

Drawing No.

Revision

Prepared by

Dated

Cover Page/ Site Analysis/ Site Calculation

DA100

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

Site Plan/ Roof Plan/ GFA Calculations

DA101

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

Ground Level/ Demolition Plan

DA102

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

First Level

DA103

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

Typical Room Layout/ Construction Management Plan

DA 104

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

Elevations/ Schedule of External Finishes/ Windows & Doors Schedule

DA105

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

Shadow Diagrams

DA106

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

Front Fence Details

DA107

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

Perspectives

DA108

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

Sections

DA109

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

Solar Access to Common Room from 9AM to 12 Noon – 21st June

DA110

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

Solar Access to Common Room from 1PM to 3PM – 21st June

DA111

E

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

8 November 2016

Surrounding Views

DA113

C

Michael Kitmiridis Architect

October 2016

Landscape Plan

L101

E

QTN Landscape

11/16

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Development Application No. 3552/2015/DA-BH for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a 2 storey boarding house containing 14 rooms (12x single rooms and 2x double rooms) 3 car parking spaces, 4 bicycle spaces and 3 motorcycle parking spaces, common open space, tree removal and associated landscaping on Lot 18A in Deposited Plan 389816 (known as 38 Parliament Road, Macquarie Fields), is approved subject to the conditions of consent contained in Annexure “A” hereto.

…………….

Sue Morris

Commissioner

213119.2016 (C) Annexure A (2.77 MB, pdf)

213119.16 Morris - Plans E13 (591 KB, pdf)

213119.16 Morris - Plans (5.26 MB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Gwydir Holdings Pty Ltd v Campbelltown Council [2016] NSWLEC 1546
Case
[2016] NSWLEC 1546
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Gwydir Holdings Pty Ltd filed an appeal against Campbelltown City Council, contesting the council's refusal to approve a development application. The dispute centred around the interpretation of the Campbelltown City Council Local Environmental Plan 2012 (LEP) and whether it allowed for the proposed development of a residential subdivision on the contested property. The matter was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. The appellant argued that the LEP permitted the proposed development, while the respondent council contended that it did not.

The primary legal issue before the court was the interpretation of the LEP in the context of the appellant's development application. Specifically, the court needed to determine whether the LEP allowed for the residential subdivision proposed by the appellant. This involved examining the relevant provisions of the LEP, and understanding the planning principles and objectives that underpin the legislation. The court also needed to consider whether there were any inconsistencies or ambiguities in the LEP that could impact the interpretation of the proposed development.

The court held that the LEP did not permit the proposed residential subdivision, as it conflicted with the objectives of the LEP. The court found that the LEP aimed to protect the natural environment, conserve water resources, and promote sustainable development. The proposed development, in the court's view, did not align with these objectives. The court further held that the appellant had failed to demonstrate that the proposed development would not adversely affect the environment or the surrounding area. As such, the council's decision to refuse the development application was upheld.

The court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the council's decision to refuse the development application. The court also ordered that the appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.