[2016] FWCA 3719
The attached document replaces the document previously issued with the above code on 8 June 2016.
This is to correct the typographical error in the main title in the preamble. It should read GWA GROUP (GAINSBOROUGH HARDWARE INDUSTRIES LTD). ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013.
Suzie Kairouz
Associate to Deputy President Gostencnik
Dated 9 June 2016
| [2016] FWCA 3719 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
GWA Group Ltd T/A Gainsborough Hardware Industries
(AG2016/3401)
GWA GROUP (GAINSBOROUGH HARDWARE INDUSTRIES LTD). ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Manufacturing and associated industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 8 JUNE 2016 |
Application for variation of the GWA Group (Gainsborough Hardware Industries Ltd). Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement known as the GWA Group (Gainsborough Hardware Industries Ltd). Enterprise Agreement 2013 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by GWA Group Ltd t/a Gainsborough Hardware Industries. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[4] The consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision. In accordance with s.216 of the Act the variation will operate on and from 8 June 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE403678 PR581370>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- GWA Group Ltd T/A Gainsborough Hardware Industries [2016] FWCA 3719
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 3719
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court needed to address were whether the proposed changes to the enterprise agreement were fair and reasonable and whether they complied with the statutory requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. The central point of contention was whether the changes adequately balanced the interests of the employer and the employees, and whether the application process was conducted in a manner that was procedurally fair.
In delivering the decision, the Fair Work Commission examined the evidence provided by both parties and considered the broader implications of the proposed changes on the workforce. The Commission found that the application was procedurally sound and that the proposed changes were fair and reasonable. It concluded that the changes did not unjustifiably alter the conditions of employment to the detriment of the employees and were in line with the statutory provisions. The court determined that the proposed variations were necessary to address the operational needs of the employer while maintaining a fair balance of interests between the parties.
The final orders of the court were that the GWA Group (Gainsborough Hardware Industries Ltd) Enterprise Agreement 2013 be varied as per the application, with the effective date of the changes set out in the decision. The variations were to be implemented in accordance with the terms specified, ensuring that all affected employees were adequately informed and consulted regarding the new conditions of employment.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.