Gurwinder Kaur (Migration)

Case

[2023] AATA 3517

11 September 2023


Gurwinder Kaur (Migration) [2023] AATA 3517 (11 September 2023)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

REVIEW APPLICANT:  Mrs Gurwinder Kaur

VISA APPLICANT:  Mrs Satinder Kaur

CASE NUMBER:  2214603

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2022/2273277

MEMBER:Joseph Lindsay

DATE:11 September 2023

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for a Visitor (Class FA) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the visa applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) (Class FA) visa:

·cl 600.211 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

Statement made on 11 September 2023 at 2:30pm

CATCHWORDS

MIGRATION – Visitor (Class FA) visa – subclass 600 (Visa) – Tourist stream – visit sister– requirement to return to her two young children in India – visa applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, s 65

Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 600.211

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

  1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 3 August 2022 to refuse to grant the visa applicant a Visitor (Class FA) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act).

  2. The visa applicant applied for the visa on 20 June 2022. At the time the visa application was lodged, Class FA contained one subclass, Subclass 600 (Visitor), with a number of different streams. In this case the applicant applied for the visa seeking to satisfy the primary criteria in the Tourist stream.

  3. The criteria for a Subclass 600 visa are set out in Part 600 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations). Relevantly to this case, they include cl 600.211, which requires the visa applicant to satisfy the Minister that the visa applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted.

  4. The delegate refused to grant the visa on the basis that the visa applicant did not meet cl 600.211 because the delegate was not satisfied that the visa applicant genuinely intended to stay temporarily in Australia.

  5. The review applicant appeared before the Tribunal on 11 September 2023 to give evidence and present arguments. The Tribunal hearing was conducted with the assistance of an interpreter in the Punjabi and English languages.

  6. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

    CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

  7. The issue in this case is whether cl 600.211 is met, which requires the Tribunal to be satisfied that the visa applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted, having regard to whether the applicant has complied substantially with the conditions to which the last substantive visa, or any subsequent bridging visa, held by the applicant was subject; whether the applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600 visa would be subject; and any other relevant matter.

  8. In the present case, the visa applicant seeks the visa for the purposes of visiting her sister, the review applicant. This is a purpose for which a visa in the Tourist stream may be granted: cl 600.221 and cl 600.222.

  9. In considering whether a visa applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for this purpose, the Tribunal must consider whether he or she has complied substantially with the conditions of the last substantive visa held, or any subsequent bridging visa (cl 600.211(a)).

  10. The visa applicant has visited Australia before in 2017 and she complied with her visa conditions. The Tribunal gives this factor high weight in the visa applicant’s favour.

  11. The Tribunal must also consider whether the visa applicant intends to comply with the conditions to which the Subclass 600 visa would be subject (cl 600.211(b)). The conditions to which a visa in the circumstances of this case would be subject are as follows (cl 600.611(2)):

    ·8101 – must not work in Australia

    ·8201 – must not engage in study or training in Australia for more than 3 months

    ·8503 – not entitled to a substantive visa, other than a protection visa, while remaining in Australia

    ·8531 – must not remain in Australia after end of permitted stay.

  12. The Tribunal received evidence that the visa applicant intends to visit Australia to see her sister. The Tribunal received evidence that: 

    - the visa applicant is married and has two young children who are of primary school age in India;

    - the visa applicant’s husband works in Dubai;

    - the visa applicant is currently not employed and is at home looking after her children;

    - the visa applicant intends to travel by herself to Australia, and leave her children in India with her extended family, for a short visit to Australia to see her sister;

    - the review applicant has given birth to her second child and is currently on maternity leave from her employment as a nurse;

    - the review applicant will pay the costs of her sister’s travel to and stay in Australia;

    - the review applicant’s father has also previously visited Australia several times and has also abided by his visa conditions.

  13. In consideration of the information available to the Tribunal, the Tribunal is satisfied that the factors that would draw the visa applicant to return to her home country, especially the requirement to return to her two young children in India, outweigh the factors that would pull her to stay in Australia. The Tribunal is satisfied that the visa applicant is likely to abide by her visa conditions.

  14. For the above reasons the Tribunal is satisfied that the visa applicant genuinely intends to stay temporarily in Australia for the purpose for which the visa is granted and finds that the requirements of cl 600.211 are met.

    DECISION

  15. The Tribunal remits the application for a Visitor (Class FA) visa for reconsideration, with the direction that the visa applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 600 (Visitor) (Class FA) visa:

    ·cl 600.211 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations.

    Joseph Lindsay
    Member

Areas of Law

  • Immigration

  • Administrative Law

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Statutory Construction

  • Remedies

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0