Guo v Parramatta City Council

Link copied
Case Copied 34 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Guo v Parramatta City Council [2020] NSWLEC 1311
Hearing dates: 18-19 and 22 June 2020
Date of orders: 21 July 2020
Decision date: 21 July 2020
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Horton C
Decision:

The Court orders that:

(1) The Applicant is granted leave to amend the application and rely upon those amendments contained in, and arising from, the Exhibit S sketch subject to the Applicant paying the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of the amendment as agreed or assessed in accordance with s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

(2)   The appeal is upheld.

(3)   Development consent is granted for Development Application No. DA/745/2018 for site consolidation, demolition works, tree removal and construction of a 53 place child care centre with basement car parking at 21-23 Norfolk Road, Epping, subject to conditions of consent in Annexure ‘A’.

(4)   All Exhibits are returned except for Exhibits R, S, T and W.

Catchwords:

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – Centre-based child care in R2 Low Density Residential zone – East Epping Heritage Conservation Area – flood planning – consideration of public submissions

Legislation Cited:

Education and Care Services National Regulations

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

Hornsby Local Environmental Plan 2013

State Environmental Planning Policy (Educational Establishments and Child Care Facilities) 2017

Cases Cited:

Cachia v Manly Council (No 2) [2009] NSWLEC 1107

Coshott v Woollahra Council [1996] NSW LEC 256

Futurespace Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council (2009) 169 LGERA 45; [2009] NSWLEC 153

New Century Developments Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (2003) 127 LGERA 303; [2003] NSWLEC 154

Texts Cited:

Hornsby Development Control Plan 2013

Land and Environment Court, ‘COVID-19 Pandemic Arrangements Policy’

NSW Child Care Planning Guideline 2017

NSW Environment Protection Authority, Noise Policy for Industrial

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Ya Xin Anna Guo (Applicant)
Parramatta City Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
A Hemmings (Applicant)
A Seton (Solicitor) (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Apex Planning & Environment Law (Applicant)
Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2019/43140
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal under s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act), against the refusal by the Parramatta Local Planning Panel on behalf of Parramatta City Council (the Respondent) of Development Application No. DA/745/2018 (the application) for the site consolidation, demolition works, tree removal and construction of a 53 place child care centre with basement car parking at 21-23 Norfolk Road, Epping (the site).

  2. On 17 March 2020, the Applicant was granted leave to amend the development application and rely upon amended plans and documents. The amendments resulting from the amended plans may be summarised as follows:

  • Revised architectural design providing a 7m separation between the retained structure and new work

  • Increased number of trees retained

  • Increased setbacks from rear to outdoor play area;

  • Reduced encroachment into the front setback;

  • Revised acoustic treatment and landscape details.

  1. At the commencement of the hearing, the Applicant sought leave to further amend the application…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Guo v Parramatta City Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] NSWLEC 1311
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Applicant, Guo, applied for leave to amend the application and sought development consent from Parramatta City Council in relation to a property at 21-23 Norfolk Road, Epping. The Council refused the application and Guo appealed to the Land and Environment Court. The Applicant contested the refusal and sought a review of the decision to refuse development consent for a 53 place child care centre with basement car parking. The legal issues before the Court were whether the Applicant should be granted leave to amend the application and, if so, whether development consent should be granted for the proposed development.

The Court found that the Applicant should be granted leave to amend the application as the proposed amendments did not constitute a new development and the Respondent was not disadvantaged. The Court also found that the proposed development would not have a significant impact on the environment or surrounding area and that the benefits of the development outweighed any potential harm. The Court was satisfied that the proposed development was consistent with the relevant planning instruments and that appropriate conditions of consent could be imposed to mitigate any potential harm. The Court therefore allowed the appeal and granted development consent for the proposed development.

The Court ordered that the Applicant be granted leave to amend the application and that development consent be granted for the proposed development. The Court also ordered that the Applicant pay the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of the amendment as agreed or assessed in accordance with s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. All Exhibits were to be returned except for Exhibits R, S, T and W.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders that:

(1) The Applicant is granted leave to amend the application and rely upon those amendments contained in, and arising from, the Exhibit S sketch subject to the Applicant paying the Respondent’s costs thrown away as a result of the amendment as agreed or assessed in accordance with s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.

(2) The appeal is upheld.

(3) Development consent is granted for Development Application No. DA/745/2018 for site consolidation, demolition works, tree removal and construction of a 53 place child care centre with basement car parking at 21-23 Norfolk Road, Epping, subject to conditions of consent in Annexure ‘A’.

(4) All Exhibits are returned except for Exhibits R, S, T and W.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.