Gujic v Arterbury

[2024] HCASL 223

GUJIC

v

ARTERBURY

[2024] HCASL 223
S60/2024

1. The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) Appellate Jurisdiction (Aldridge, Austin and Gill JJ), which dismissed the applicant's appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) (Brasch J) and the applicant's Application in an Appeal filed on 12 March 2024.

2. The proposed appeal is not an appropriate vehicle to consider s 146 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth). Further, it cannot be said that the interests of the administration of justice, either generally or in this case, weigh in favour of the grant of special leave. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant the extension of time that is required.

3. Special leave to appeal is refused with costs.

   Gageler CJ
   Gordon J
   Edelman J
   Steward J 
   Gleeson J
   Jagot J
   Beech-Jones J

   5 September 2024