Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia
(DIVISION 1)
Grimmond & Hartin (No 3) [2022] FedCFamC1F 917
File number(s): DNC 234 of 2021 Judgment of: BERMAN J Date of judgment: 11 November 2022 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Subpoena – Where the applicant issued various subpoenas in relation to the second respondent’s business – Where the subpoenas were the subject of objection by the second respondent – Where the applicant conceded that there was merit in the objection and sought leave to amend the schedule to limit the scope – Where the test of relevance is satisfied – Where no evidence is provided by the second respondent to support his contention that the subpoena catches 106,225 pages and will cost $165,000 to comply – Orders made. Cases cited: Hatten v Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Australia & Ors (2000) FLC 93- 038
Lucas Industries Ltd v Hewitt & Ors (1978) 18 ALR 555
Martin & Martin & Anor (No 2) [2014] FamCA 232
Woley and Humboldt (No 4) [2009] FamCA 546
Division: Division 1 First Instance Number of paragraphs: 31 Date of hearing: 11 November 2022 Place: Adelaide via MS Teams Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Giacomo Solicitor for the Applicant: Darwin Family Law Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Berghofer Solicitor for the Respondent: Cozens Johansen Lawyers Counsel for the Objector: Mr Cavanagh Solicitor for the Objector: Withnalls Lawyers ORDERS
DNC 234 of 2021 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)
BETWEEN: MS GRIMMOND
Applicant
AND: MR HARTIN
Respondent
order made by:
BERMAN J
DATE OF ORDER:
11 NOVEMBER 2022
THE COURT ORDERS:
1.That the Applicant be granted leave to amend the Schedule of the subpoena to B Pty Ltd filed 4 October 2022, to read as follows:
1.A copy of this subpoena.
2.Any quotations prepared by B Pty Ltd with respect to any work undertaken for the following:
2.1Q Pty Ltd;
2.2R Trust;
2.3S Pty Ltd;
2.4T Pty Ltd;
2.5U Pty Ltd;
2.6V Pty Ltd;
2.7 W Pty Ltd;
2.8X Pty Ltd;
2.9Y Pty Ltd;
2.10Mr Z;
2.11Mr AA;
2.12Mr BB;
2.13Mr DD;
2.14Mr CC;
2.15Mr EE;
2.16Mr FF;
2.17Mr GG; and
2.18Mr HH.
3.Any contracts entered into by B Pty Ltd, including purchase orders and/or accepted quotations for supply of services to the following:
3.1Q Pty Ltd;
3.2R Trust;
3.3S Pty Ltd;
3.4T Pty Ltd;
3.5U Pty Ltd;
3.6V Pty Ltd;
3.7W Pty Ltd;
3.8X Pty Ltd;
3.9Y Pty Ltd;
3.10Mr Z;
3.11Mr AA;
3.12Mr BB;
3.13Mr DD;
3.14Mr CC;
3.15Mr EE;
3.16Mr FF;
3.17Mr GG; and
3.18Mr HH.
2.That the Notice of Objection filed 19 October 2022, is dismissed.
3.That the time for compliance by B Pty Ltd is extended to 9.00 am on 21 November 2022.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family…
Continue reading Grimmond & Hartin (No 3)
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Grimmond & Hartin (No 3) [2022] FedCFamC1F 917
- Case
- [2022] FedCFamC1F 917
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Berman J addressed the legal principles governing the issuance of subpoenas, emphasizing the importance of relevance and the proper administration of justice. The court referenced several precedents to establish that the relevance of documents should not be limited to those directly admissible in court but could include any documents that may throw light on the issues in the case. The court found that Ms Grimmond's assertion that Mr Hartin and her son had set up a competing business was supported by the business plan of the competing company. The court dismissed the objections to the subpoenas, holding that the subpoenas were relevant to the issues before the court and did not amount to an abuse of process or a fishing expedition. The court also noted that the cost of compliance could be addressed once the documents were produced.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.