Gregory Roman Chalik v Igor Chalik

Case [2024] NSWCA 203


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Gregory Roman Chalik v Igor Chalik [2024] NSWCA 203
Hearing dates: 12 August 2024
Date of orders: 12 August 2024
Decision date: 12 August 2024
Before: Price AJA
Decision:

1. Strike out causes of actions (A)-(I), clause 5 and grounds 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 24(5), 25, 26 and 27 of the appellant’s Further Amended Notice of Appeal dated 29 July 2024.

2. Make a direction to the Registrar pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 7.36 to refer the appellant to a barrister or solicitor in the pro bono scheme panel to redraft the Further Amended Notice of Appeal.

3. Stand the matter over to 19 August 2024 before the Registrar and extend the current stay of the orders made by Henry J until 19 August 2024.

4. I make no orders as to costs.

Catchwords:

APPEALS — procedure — time limits — whether notice of appeal ought be dismissed for failure to serve on respondent in time

CIVIL PROCEDURE — summary disposal — notice of motion seeking striking out or dismissal of proceedings — abuse of process — no reasonable cause of action — frivolous or vexatious proceedings — where self-represented appellant failed to adequately draft grounds of appeal

Legislation Cited:

Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 63

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 51.41, 7.36

Category:Procedural rulings
Parties: Gregory Roman Chalik (Appellant/ Respondent in Notice of Motion)
Igor Chalik (Respondent/ Applicant in Notice of Motion)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr G Chalik (Appellant/ Respondent in Notice of Motion) (Self-Represented, appeared by AVL)
Mr N Allan (Respondent/ Applicant in Notice of Motion)

Solicitors:
Ziman & Ziman Solicitors (Respondent/ Applicant in Notice of Motion)
File Number(s): 2024/00094840
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Equity
Citation:

[2023] NSWSC 117

Date of Decision:
16 February 2024
Before:
Henry J
File Number(s):
2021/326779 and 2021/296823

EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT

  1. PRICE AJA: In these proceedings, this afternoon, the first respondent, in the underlying appeal, Igor Chalik, by an amended notice of motion sought orders in paras 1 and 2 for substantive relief. Those paragraphs sought orders dismissing the appeal summarily under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 51.41 and Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 63(3)(a) as having been improperly served and commenced out of time.

  2. Following discussions with Mr Allan of counsel, to whose attention I directed the Registrar’s orders made on 22 July 2024, these prayers have not been pressed.

  3. The alternative prayer in para 3 of the notice of motion has been pressed, in particular, the orders sought in para 3(a), striking out the appellant's further amended notice of appeal dated 29 July 2024 as not disclosing any arguable appeal, and being frivolous and vexatious and an abuse of process and, in para 3(b) seeking to dismiss the proceedings on the same basis.

  4. I do not propose…

Continue reading Gregory Roman Chalik v Igor Chalik

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Gregory Roman Chalik v Igor Chalik [2024] NSWCA 203
Case
[2024] NSWCA 203
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The proceeding concerned an appeal by Gregory Roman Chalik against Igor Chalik. The primary dispute revolved around the adequacy of the appellant's drafted grounds of appeal, leading to a motion by the respondent seeking to strike out or dismiss the proceedings. The matter was heard by Price AJA.

The court was required to determine whether the appellant's Further Amended Notice of Appeal, filed on 29 July 2024, was so deficient as to constitute an abuse of process, lack a reasonable cause of action, or be frivolous or vexatious. A related issue was the timeliness of service of the notice of appeal on the respondent.

Price AJA reasoned that the appellant, who was self-represented, had failed to adequately draft the grounds of appeal, rendering them unintelligible and therefore an abuse of process. The court found that many of the grounds were not properly formulated and did not disclose a reasonable cause of action. Consequently, the court ordered that specific causes of action and numerous grounds of appeal be struck out. The court also directed the Registrar to refer the appellant to the pro bono scheme to have the notice of appeal redrafted, and the matter was adjourned to a later date.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Strike out causes of actions (A)-(I), clause 5 and grounds 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 24(5), 25, 26 and 27 of the appellant’s Further Amended Notice of Appeal dated 29 July 2024.

2. Make a direction to the Registrar pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 7.36 to refer the appellant to a barrister or solicitor in the pro bono scheme panel to redraft the Further Amended Notice of Appeal.

3. Stand the matter over to 19 August 2024 before the Registrar and extend the current stay of the orders made by Henry J until 19 August 2024.

4. I make no orders as to costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.