Court of Appeal
Supreme Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: Gregory Roman Chalik v Igor Chalik [2024] NSWCA 203 Hearing dates: 12 August 2024 Date of orders: 12 August 2024 Decision date: 12 August 2024 Before: Price AJA Decision: 1. Strike out causes of actions (A)-(I), clause 5 and grounds 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 24(5), 25, 26 and 27 of the appellant’s Further Amended Notice of Appeal dated 29 July 2024.
2. Make a direction to the Registrar pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 7.36 to refer the appellant to a barrister or solicitor in the pro bono scheme panel to redraft the Further Amended Notice of Appeal.
3. Stand the matter over to 19 August 2024 before the Registrar and extend the current stay of the orders made by Henry J until 19 August 2024.
4. I make no orders as to costs.
Catchwords: APPEALS — procedure — time limits — whether notice of appeal ought be dismissed for failure to serve on respondent in time
CIVIL PROCEDURE — summary disposal — notice of motion seeking striking out or dismissal of proceedings — abuse of process — no reasonable cause of action — frivolous or vexatious proceedings — where self-represented appellant failed to adequately draft grounds of appeal
Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 63
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 51.41, 7.36
Category: Procedural rulings Parties: Gregory Roman Chalik (Appellant/ Respondent in Notice of Motion)
Igor Chalik (Respondent/ Applicant in Notice of Motion)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Mr G Chalik (Appellant/ Respondent in Notice of Motion) (Self-Represented, appeared by AVL)
Mr N Allan (Respondent/ Applicant in Notice of Motion)
Ziman & Ziman Solicitors (Respondent/ Applicant in Notice of Motion)
File Number(s): 2024/00094840 Decision under appeal
- Court or tribunal:
- Supreme Court of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction:
- Equity
- Citation:
- Date of Decision:
- 16 February 2024
- Before:
- Henry J
- File Number(s):
- 2021/326779 and 2021/296823
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT
-
PRICE AJA: In these proceedings, this afternoon, the first respondent, in the underlying appeal, Igor Chalik, by an amended notice of motion sought orders in paras 1 and 2 for substantive relief. Those paragraphs sought orders dismissing the appeal summarily under Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 51.41 and Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 63(3)(a) as having been improperly served and commenced out of time.
-
Following discussions with Mr Allan of counsel, to whose attention I directed the Registrar’s orders made on 22 July 2024, these prayers have not been pressed.
-
The alternative prayer in para 3 of the notice of motion has been pressed, in particular, the orders sought in para 3(a), striking out the appellant's further amended notice of appeal dated 29 July 2024 as not disclosing any arguable appeal, and being frivolous and vexatious and an abuse of process and, in para 3(b) seeking to dismiss the proceedings on the same basis.
-
I do not propose…
Continue reading Gregory Roman Chalik v Igor Chalik
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Gregory Roman Chalik v Igor Chalik [2024] NSWCA 203
- Case
- [2024] NSWCA 203
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the appellant's Further Amended Notice of Appeal, filed on 29 July 2024, was so deficient as to constitute an abuse of process, lack a reasonable cause of action, or be frivolous or vexatious. A related issue was the timeliness of service of the notice of appeal on the respondent.
Price AJA reasoned that the appellant, who was self-represented, had failed to adequately draft the grounds of appeal, rendering them unintelligible and therefore an abuse of process. The court found that many of the grounds were not properly formulated and did not disclose a reasonable cause of action. Consequently, the court ordered that specific causes of action and numerous grounds of appeal be struck out. The court also directed the Registrar to refer the appellant to the pro bono scheme to have the notice of appeal redrafted, and the matter was adjourned to a later date.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Strike out causes of actions (A)-(I), clause 5 and grounds 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, 15, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 24(5), 25, 26 and 27 of the appellant’s Further Amended Notice of Appeal dated 29 July 2024.
2. Make a direction to the Registrar pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 7.36 to refer the appellant to a barrister or solicitor in the pro bono scheme panel to redraft the Further Amended Notice of Appeal.
3. Stand the matter over to 19 August 2024 before the Registrar and extend the current stay of the orders made by Henry J until 19 August 2024.
4. I make no orders as to costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.