GREENAWAY
v
THE QUEEN
[2022] HCASL 92
S193/2021
An extension of time is required for this application to proceed. This application for special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Macfarlan JA, Walton and Wilson JJ) does not identify any reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court. It would therefore be futile to grant an extension of time. The application should be dismissed.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
M.M. Gordon J.J. Edelman 5 May 2022
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Greenaway v The Queen and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2022] HCASL 92
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the application for special leave to appeal should be granted and whether an extension of time should be provided for the application to proceed. The primary focus was on the applicant's argument for an extension of time and the sufficiency of the grounds for special leave to appeal.
The High Court found that the application did not provide any reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision, and therefore, it would be futile to grant an extension of time. The Court held that the application for special leave to appeal was not supported by any compelling argument and did not present a case of exceptional circumstances warranting an extension of time. Consequently, the application was dismissed, and the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. The Court of Appeal's decision was upheld, and the applicant's appeal was not allowed to proceed.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.