Greenaway v The Queen

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

GREENAWAY

v

THE QUEEN

[2022] HCASL 92
S193/2021

  1. An extension of time is required for this application to proceed. This application for special leave to appeal from a judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Macfarlan JA, Walton and Wilson JJ) does not identify any reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Court. It would therefore be futile to grant an extension of time. The application should be dismissed.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

M.M. Gordon J.J. Edelman
5 May 2022
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Greenaway v The Queen and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2022] HCASL 92
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Greenaway v The Queen, the applicant sought an extension of time to appeal a judgment from the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The original dispute involved the applicant's criminal conviction and sentencing, which was reviewed and upheld by the Court of Criminal Appeal. The matter was brought before the High Court for special leave to appeal, however, the applicant's application did not provide a compelling reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision.

The legal issues before the court were whether the application for special leave to appeal should be granted and whether an extension of time should be provided for the application to proceed. The primary focus was on the applicant's argument for an extension of time and the sufficiency of the grounds for special leave to appeal.

The High Court found that the application did not provide any reason to doubt the correctness of the Court of Criminal Appeal's decision, and therefore, it would be futile to grant an extension of time. The Court held that the application for special leave to appeal was not supported by any compelling argument and did not present a case of exceptional circumstances warranting an extension of time. Consequently, the application was dismissed, and the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. The Court of Appeal's decision was upheld, and the applicant's appeal was not allowed to proceed.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.