[2013] FWCA 3215 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2013/1092)
GREAT LAKES DREDGE & DOCK AUSTRALIA PTY LTD CONTRACT NON-PROPELLED DREDGING, AIMPE GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2013
Dredging industry | |
VICE PRESIDENT WATSON | SYDNEY, 22 MAY 2013 |
Application for approval of the Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Australia Pty Ltd Contract Non-Propelled Dredging, AIMPE Greenfields Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Australia Pty Ltd Contract Non-Propelled Dredging, AIMPE Greenfields Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement. It has been made by Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Australia Pty Ltd and the Australian Institute of Marine and Power Engineers (AIMPE).
[2] The application is made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.In particular, I am satisfied that the AIMPE is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[3] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 29 May 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 March 2017.
VICE PRESIDENT WATSON
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE401383 PR537132>
- AGLC
- Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Australia Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 3215
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 3215
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the contract between Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Australia Pty Ltd and AIMPE adhered to the legislative requirements and industry standards. The court had to scrutinise the terms of the contract to ensure that they provided adequate protection to both parties and aligned with the statutory provisions. Furthermore, the court examined whether the contract facilitated fair and equitable practices in the dredging industry, as mandated by law.
In delivering its judgment, the court assessed the contract's provisions against the legal and regulatory criteria. It determined that the contract was compliant with the relevant laws and industry standards. The court found that the terms of the contract were fair and reasonable, providing adequate protections for both parties. Consequently, the Federal Court approved the contract, allowing the parties to proceed with their dredging operations under the agreed terms. This decision confirmed that the contract met the necessary legal requirements and could be implemented without further amendments.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.