Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Gray & anor v Pittwater Council [2016] NSWLEC 1176 Hearing dates: 2-4 March 2016 Date of orders: 13 May 2016 Decision date: 13 May 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Tuor C Decision: (1) The appeal is upheld in part.
(2) The Council is directed to issue Building Certificate (BC0080/14) for the deck, ramp, pontoon, piles and wave baffle constructed below MHWM at 5 Sturdee Lane, Elvina Bay in respect of the Works the subject of these proceedings, within 14 days of the Applicant providing a survey by a Registered Surveyor and confirming, to council’s satisfaction, that the following works have been done:
a. demolish, alter or rebuild the 3 free-standing berthing piles so that there are no more than 2 free-standing berthing piles not greater than 2.67m AHD in height and paint the top 1m of the resultant free-standing piles white;
b. remove one handrail from the ramp;
c. if the south east free-standing pile is removed, paint the top 1m of the southern most end pile of the wave baffle white.
(3) The exhibits, except Exhibits 1 and J, are returned.Catchwords: BUILDING CERTIFICATE APPLICATION: jetty, pontoon and piles. Visual impact and navigational safety. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979;
Land and Environment Court Act;
Crown Lands Act 1989;
Fisheries Management Act 1994;
Pittwater Local Environmental Plan 2014Cases Cited: Ireland v Cessnock [1999] NSWLEC 250, (1999) LGERA 311
Taipan Holdings Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [1999] NSWLEC 276Category: Principal judgment Parties: Dr Bruce Gray and Ms Julie-Anne Gray (Applicant)
Pittwater Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Dr J Smith (Applicant)Ms H Irish (Respondent)
Solicitors:
King & Wood Mallesons (Respondent)
ERA Legal (Applicant)
File Number(s): 10681 of 2015
Judgment
-
Dr and Ms Gray (applicant) are appealing under s 149F(1)(a) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of a Building Certificate Application (BC0080/14) by Pittwater Council (council) for works constructed without development consent on Crown Land below mean high water mark (MHWM) adjoining 5 Sturdee Lane, Elvina Bay (site).
-
The key contentions are whether:
the size, scale and extent of works is uncharacteristic of the residential waterfront setting resulting in an adverse visual impact when viewed from the waterway; and
the works reduce public access to the water, principally for the ferry.
Site and locality
-
5 Sturdee Lane is irregular in shape with an area of about 3512sqm and a 58m wide frontage to Elvina Bay, which forms part of the Pittwater Waterway. It is developed with a house that is located towards the centre of the Land within significant vegetation. A timber boathouse adjoins the south west corner of the Land, below MHWM on Crown Land that is leased by the applicant. The house and the boathouse are accessed from the water via other structures below MHWM.
-
The Building Certificate Application relates to the structures below MHWM, which include a timber deck, timber ramp, timber pontoon, two stabilising piles,…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Gray v Pittwater Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1176
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central issue before the court was whether the works the applicant undertook constituted 'building work' requiring a certificate under the Building Act 2000 (NSW). Specifically, the applicant sought to have the works classified as 'minor works', exempt from the need for a certificate. The applicant also argued that the Council's refusal to issue a certificate was unreasonable and that the Council had incorrectly applied the Building Act 2000 (NSW).
The court found that the works undertaken by the applicant constituted 'building work' within the meaning of the Building Act 2000 (NSW). However, the court also found that the applicant's works were not substantial enough to require a certificate under the Act. The court held that the applicant's works were minor and did not pose a significant risk to public safety or health. The court also found that the Council's refusal to issue a certificate was unreasonable and that the Council had incorrectly applied the Building Act 2000 (NSW). The court held that the applicant's works were minor and did not pose a significant risk to public safety or health. The court ordered that the Council issue a Building Certificate for the works undertaken by the applicant, subject to certain conditions.
The court ordered that the appeal be upheld in part, and that the Council issue a Building Certificate for the works undertaken by the applicant, subject to certain conditions. The court ordered that the Council issue the certificate within 14 days of the applicant providing a survey by a Registered Surveyor and confirming, to council’s satisfaction, that the specified works had been done. The court also ordered that the exhibits, except Exhibits 1 and J, be returned.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) The appeal is upheld in part.
(2) The Council is directed to issue Building Certificate (BC0080/14) for the deck, ramp, pontoon, piles and wave baffle constructed below MHWM at 5 Sturdee Lane, Elvina Bay in respect of the Works the subject of these proceedings, within 14 days of the Applicant providing a survey by a Registered Surveyor and confirming, to council’s satisfaction, that the following works have been done:
a. demolish, alter or rebuild the 3 free-standing berthing piles so that there are no more than 2 free-standing berthing piles not greater than 2.67m AHD in height and paint the top 1m of the resultant free-standing piles white;
b. remove one handrail from the ramp;
c. if the south east free-standing pile is removed, paint the top 1m of the southern most end pile of the wave baffle white.
(3) The exhibits, except Exhibits 1 and J, are returned.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.