Legal Research
Cases
Gray v Kuek

Gray v Kuek

Case [2022] VCC 1203

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Gray v Kuek [2022] VCC 1203
Case: [2022] VCC 1203
Decision Date: 1 August 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Gray v Kuek [2022] VCC 1203

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Ganesh v National Australia Bank Ltd [2021] VSCA 45
Citation 1 (Para 2)

…ees, but that it was entitled to recovery of costs in respect of disbursements incurred by it.[6] [6] See also Ganesh v National Australia Bank [2021] VSCA 45 at [89].…
Anandavalli Ganesh and Ganesh Radhakrishnan v National Australia Bank Limited (ABN 004 044 937) [2020] VSCA 39
Citation 2 (Para 1)

…for the time spent but they are entitled to a costs order and for disbursements properly incurred.[7] [7] Ganesh & Anor v National Australia Bank Ltd [2020] VSCA 39 (Leave Reasons) at [55].…
Zhao v Suzhou Haishun Investment Management Co Ltd [2020] VSCA 34
Citation 3 (Para 2)

…In Zhao v Suzhou Haishum Investment Management Co Ltd [2020] VSCA 34 (“Zhao”), the Court of Appeal accepted as a general principle: We accept as a general principle that where a party litigates for some time and then acts so as to effectively surrender or capitulate to the other, that will usually be a strong gro…
United Petroleum Australia Pty Ltd v Herbert Smith Freehills [2020] VSCA 15
Citation 4 (Para 2)

…ther a self-represented barrister or solicitor is entitled to claim disbursements. However, in United Petroleum Australia PL v Herbert Smith Freehill [2020] VSCA 15 (“United Petroleum”) at [121]–[122] the Victorian Court of Appeal held that a firm of solicitors, was not entitled to recovery of costs for time spen…
Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow [2019] HCA 29
Citation 5 (Para 5)

…provided after I requested that the parties address the issues raised by the High Court of Australia’s decisions in Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow [2019] HCA 29 (“Bell”), and Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (Cth); Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 (“Lai Qin”).…
Yara Australia Pty Ltd v Oswal [2013] VSCA 337
Citation 6

…inister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (Cth); Ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; Cockburn v Shehadie [2013] NSWSC 758; Yara Australia Pty Ltd v Oswal [2013] VSCA 337; ACN 005 490 540 Pty Ltd v Robert Frederick Jane Pty Ltd [2016] VSC 217; Ganesh & Anor v National Australia Bank Ltd [2020] VSCA 39 (Leave Reasons); Ga…
Cockburn v Shehadie [2013] NSWSC 758
Citation 7

…ll Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow [2019] HCA 29; Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (Cth); Ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; Cockburn v Shehadie [2013] NSWSC 758; Yara Australia Pty Ltd v Oswal [2013] VSCA 337; ACN 005 490 540 Pty Ltd v Robert Frederick Jane Pty Ltd [2016] VSC 217; Ganesh & Anor v National Austr…
Chen v Chan [2009] VSCA 233
Citation 8 (Para 6)

…rian Workcover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298, Towie v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria [2008] VSCA 157, and Chen & Ors v Chan & Ors [2009] VSCA 233; (f)the plaintiff’s claim was statute-barred.…
Hazeldene's Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298
Citation 9 (Para 6)

…the offer”; (e)the plaintiff’s conduct contravened the principles in Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298, Towie v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria [2008] VSCA 157, and Chen & Ors v Chan & Ors [2009] VSCA 233; (f)the plaintiff’s claim was statute-barred.…
Re Minister For Immigration and Ethnic Affairs; ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6
Citation 10

…s v Chan & Ors [2009] VSCA 233; Bell Lawyers Pty Ltd v Pentelow [2019] HCA 29; Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (Cth); Ex parte Lai Qin [1997] HCA 6; Cockburn v Shehadie [2013] NSWSC 758; Yara Australia Pty Ltd v Oswal [2013] VSCA 337; ACN 005 490 540 Pty Ltd v Robert Frederick Jane Pty Ltd [2016] V…
Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59
Citation 11 (Para 2)

…cretion and a successful party is prima facie entitled to a costs order.[2] [1] Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 at 624-5, citing Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534. [2] Ibid.…
Towie v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria [2008] VSCA 157
Citation 12 (Para 6)

…s in Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian Workcover Authority (No 2) [2005] VSCA 298, Towie v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria [2008] VSCA 157, and Chen & Ors v Chan & Ors [2009] VSCA 233; (f)the plaintiff’s claim was statute-barred.…
ACN 005 490 540 Pty Ltd v Robert Frederick Jane Pty Ltd [2016] VSC 217
Citation 13

…CA 6; Cockburn v Shehadie [2013] NSWSC 758; Yara Australia Pty Ltd v Oswal [2013] VSCA 337; ACN 005 490 540 Pty Ltd v Robert Frederick Jane Pty Ltd [2016] VSC 217; Ganesh & Anor v National Australia Bank Ltd [2020] VSCA 39 (Leave Reasons); Ganesh & Anor v National Australia Bank Ltd [2021] VSCA 45; United Petrole…

AI Chat coming soon