FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| GRANT & GRANT | [2017] FamCA 291 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Interim orders – with whom a child spends time – overnight time – where husband seeks overnight time for the parties’ daughter aged 4 – where the wife opposes – where the wife says the child will not cope with separation – where the child already spends substantial time with the father each Saturday and Sunday –where the Court considers the evidence of the family consultant that the child should not have overnight time – where the Court considers it is the best interest of the child to spend overnight time with the husband – Husband’s application allowed. FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Interim orders – international travel – where the wife is an American citizen and seeks to take the children to the United States of America and Country D over the Christmas 2017 holidays – where the husband opposes the application – where the Court considers that the United States of America and Country D are Hague Convention countries – where the Court balanced the interests of the children having a meaningful relationship with the wife’s family and their relationship with the husband – where international travel allowed – Wife’s application allowed. Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 60CC |
| Andrew & Delaine [2009] FamCAFC 182 | |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Grant |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Grant |
| FILE NUMBER: | ADC | 1153 | of | 2016 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 10 May 2017 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Adelaide |
| PLACE HEARD: | Adelaide |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Berman J |
| HEARING DATE: | 2 May 2017 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Ms Lewis |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Jordan & Fowler |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mr Lindsay |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | BBS Lawyers |
Orders
it is ordered until further order:
That the previous parenting orders be discharged.
That the parties each have equal shared parental responsibility for B (“B”) born … 2012 and C (“C”) born … 2016.
That until further order the children live with the wife and spend time with the husband as follows:-
(a) With B:
(i)From Monday at the conclusion of the child’s attendance at the Early Learning Centre or school to the commencement of her attendance at the Early Learning Centre or school (and if neither to the wife at 9.00 am) on the following Tuesday commencing Monday 22 May 2017 and each alternate week thereafter;
(ii)From 10.00 am Saturday to 6.00 pm Sunday commencing 13 May 2017 and alternate week thereafter:
(b) With C:
(i) Each Monday and Friday from 9.00 am to 11.00 am.
That the wife have leave to remove the children from the Commonwealth of Australia for a period of twenty one (21) days during December 2017 and January 2018 at such times as may be agreed between the parties or as ordered by the Court.
That within thirty (30) days of the wife’s intended date of travel she provide to the husband:-
(a) an itinerary of travel;
(b)the address and contact details of each place that the children are to reside in;
Continue reading GRANT & GRANT
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- GRANT & GRANT [2017] FamCA 291
- Case
- [2017] FamCA 291
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether it was in the best interests of the children, pursuant to section 60CC of the *Family Law Act 1975* (Cth), to grant the husband's application for overnight time with C and to grant the wife's application for international travel with both children. The court also had to consider the evidence of the family consultant regarding C's capacity to cope with overnight stays.
Regarding C's overnight time, the court considered the family consultant's evidence but ultimately found it to be in the child's best interests to spend overnight time with the husband. In relation to international travel, the court balanced the children's interest in maintaining a meaningful relationship with the wife's family against their relationship with the husband, noting that both the United States of America and Country D are Hague Convention countries. The court allowed the wife's application for international travel.
The court ordered the discharge of previous parenting orders and established equal shared parental responsibility for B and C. The children were to live with the wife and spend time with the husband on specific days and alternate weekends, with detailed provisions for B's time. The wife was granted leave to remove the children from Australia for twenty-one days during December 2017 and January 2018, to travel only to the United States of America and Country D, and was required to provide the husband with an itinerary, accommodation details, and return flights within thirty days of her intended travel date.
Orders
Orders of the court
it is ordered until further order:
1.
That the previous parenting orders be discharged.
2.
That the parties each have equal shared parental responsibility for B (“B”) born … 2012 and C (“C”) born … 2016.
3.
That until further order the children live with the wife and spend time with the husband as follows:-
(a) With B:
(i) From Monday at the conclusion of the child’s attendance at the Early Learning Centre or school to the commencement of her attendance at the Early Learning Centre or school (and if neither to the wife at 9.00 am) on the following Tuesday commencing Monday 22 May 2017 and each alternate week thereafter;
(ii) From 10.00 am Saturday to 6.00 pm Sunday commencing 13 May 2017 and alternate week thereafter:
(b) With C:
(i) Each Monday and Friday from 9.00 am to 11.00 am.
4.
That the wife have leave to remove the children from the Commonwealth of Australia for a period of twenty one (21) days during December 2017 and January 2018 at such times as may be agreed between the parties or as ordered by the Court.
5.
That within thirty (30) days of the wife’s intended date of travel she provide to the husband:-
(a) an itinerary of travel;
(b) the address and contact details of each place that the children are to reside in;
(c) return flights for the children.
6.
The wife is restrained and an injunction granted restraining the wife from taking the children to any country other than Country D and the United States of America other than as may be required for transit purposes.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.