Grant and Grant-Lovett

Case [2010] FMCAfam 162


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

GRANT & GRANT-LOVETT [2010] FMCAfam 162
FAMILY LAW – Application to set aside a binding financial agreement – application to enforce agreement – non-compliance with s.90G – non-disclosure under s.90K(1)(a) – defence of estoppel.
Family Law Act 1975 ss.79, 90B, 90C, 90G, 90K, 90KA
Black & Black [2008] FamCAFC 7
Kostres & Kostres [2009] FamCAFC 222
Fevia v Carmel-Fevia [2009] FamCA 816
Kennon v Spry (2008) 83 ALJR 145
Commercial Bank of Australia Limited v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447
Applicant: MR GRANT
Respondent: MS GRANT-LOVETT
File Number: WOC 1152 of 2008
Judgment of: Altobelli FM
Hearing date: 9 November 2009
Date of Last Submission: 9 November 2009
Delivered at: Sydney
Delivered on: 19 March 2010

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Maurice
Solicitors for the Applicant: RMB Family Law
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Moss
Solicitors for the Respondent: Marriott & Oliver Solicitors

ORDERS

  1. The document which purports to be a binding financial agreement dated 28 June 2002 is set aside.

  2. The parties attend a conciliation conference on 23 April 2010 at 11am in Wollongong with a view to settling the claim.

  3. The parties comply with rule 24.04 of the Federal Magistrates Rules by serving on each other copies of the documents listed in that Rule by no later than 4.00 p.m. on 8 April 2010. Namely:

    (a)Copies of 3 most recent taxation returns;

    (b)Copies of 3 most recent taxation assessments;

    (c)If the party is a member of a superannuation plan:

    (i)     if not already filed or exchanged – the completed superannuation information form for any superannuation interest of the party;

    (ii)for a self-managed superannuation fund- the trust deed and copies of the 3 most recent financial statements for the fund;

    (d)If the party has an ABN, copies of the last 4 business activity statements lodged, if any, and:

    (e)The 3 most recent financial statements and the last 4 business activity statements of any partnership, trust or company (other than a public company) in which that party has an interest.

  4. The matter be adjourned for mention to 5 May 2010 at 9.30am in Wollongong.

  5. The Respondent wife file an Amended response within 28 days.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Grant & Grant-Lovett is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
SYDNEY

WOC 1152 of 2008

MR GRANT

Applicant

And

MS GRANT-LOVETT

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction and Background

  1. This is an application by the applicant husband to set aside a binding financial agreement that he entered into with the respondent wife, and which is dated 28 June 2002.  The matter was set down for hearing before me on the discrete issue as to the validity of the binding financial agreement and on the basis that if the agreement was set aside, any hearing of matters arising under section 79 of the Family Law Act would be dealt with at a later time.

  2. The applicant husband is 55 years…

Continue reading Grant and Grant-Lovett

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Grant and Grant-Lovett [2010] FMCAfam 162
Case
[2010] FMCAfam 162
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Family Law Rules 1997 (Cth) in relation to the conciliation conference. The Court heard the evidence of the parties in this matter and considered the affidavit evidence and documents filed by the parties. The parties in this matter were husband and wife who had entered into a financial agreement dated 28 June 2002. The wife had subsequently sought to have the agreement set aside on the basis that it was not binding. The legal issues in this matter were whether the financial agreement was binding, and if not, whether it was appropriate to set the agreement aside. The Court found that the financial agreement was not binding as it did not comply with the requirements of section 90 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The Court found that the husband had not fully disclosed all of his assets and liabilities to the wife, and that the wife had not received independent legal advice in relation to the agreement. The Court ordered that the financial agreement be set aside. The Court also ordered that the parties attend a conciliation conference to attempt to settle the matter.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The document which purports to be a binding financial agreement dated 28 June 2002 is set aside.

2.

The parties attend a conciliation conference on 23 April 2010 at 11am in Wollongong with a view to settling the claim.

3.

The parties comply with rule 24.04 of the

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.