| [2019] FWCA 212 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Grandview Landscapes Pty Ltd T/A Grandview Landscapes
(AG2018/6865)
GRANDVIEW LANDSCAPES PTY LTD AND THE CFMEU BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MASSON | MELBOURNE, 16 JANUARY 2019 |
Application for termination of the Grandview Landscapes Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015.
[1] Grandview Landscapes Pty Ltd T/A Grandview Landscapes (Applicant) has applied, pursuant to s 225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act), to terminate the Grandview Landscapes Pty Ltd and the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 (Agreement). The Agreement is expressed to cover the Applicant and the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU). The Agreement has passed its nominal expiry date.
[2] Section 225 of the Act provides:
“225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:
(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;
(b) an employee covered by the agreement;
(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.”
[3] Section 226 of the Act provides:
“226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement
If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:
(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and
(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:
(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and
(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.”
[4] The CFMEU is an organisation covered by the Agreement. In correspondence to my Chambers of 14 January 2019, the CFMEU advised that it does not oppose the application. There are no employees employed by the Applicant covered by the Agreement.
[5] Based on the material contained in the employer’s declaration received on 10 December 2018 and additional material received on 19 December 2018, I am satisfied that termination of the Agreement is not contrary to the public interest. Taking into account all of the circumstances including those in s 226(b)(i) and (ii) of the Act, I consider that it is appropriate to terminate the Agreement. There is nothing before me which raises public interest considerations which might militate against termination of the Agreement and as stated in the email from the Applicant dated 19 December 2018, there are no employees covered by the Agreement. I am satisfied that it is appropriate to approve the termination of the Agreement, and I terminate the Agreement.
[6] The termination will operate from 16 January 2019. An Order to that effect will be issued with this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE404799 PR703838>
- AGLC
- Grandview Landscapes Pty Ltd T/A Grandview Landscapes [2019] FWCA 212
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 212
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission involved assessing whether Grandview Landscapes had met the threshold criteria for termination of the enterprise agreement. The applicant needed to demonstrate that there had been a significant change in the nature of its business or operations that had resulted in a significant change in the types of employees employed, the types of work performed, or the location of the work. Additionally, the applicant had to show that the agreement was no longer appropriate for its current operations.
The Commission found that Grandview Landscapes had not demonstrated the necessary significant changes in its business or workforce to justify termination of the enterprise agreement. The evidence presented did not establish that there had been a substantial shift in the nature of the business or the workforce, nor did it show that the agreement was inappropriate for the current operations. Consequently, the application for termination was dismissed.
The Fair Work Commission ordered that the application for termination of the CFMEU Building and Construction Industry Enterprise Agreement 2011-2015 by Grandview Landscapes Pty Ltd be dismissed. The agreement remained in effect, and the terms and conditions outlined within it continued to apply to the applicant and its employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.