FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| GRAHAM & KOVACS | [2014] FamCA 702 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Orders – Suspension of Time - Best Interests of the Children – Where mother sought the suspension of orders insofar as they permitted the father to spend time with the children – Where events occurred are controversial but resulted in police attending the father’s home, placing the father in handcuffs and taking him into custody whilst the children were in the care of the father – Where one or more of the children were aware of the events as they were occurring and understandably upset – Where concerns as to whether the father would presently be in a position to be able to provide adequate care for the children – Where father conceded that he was not presently in sufficiently good health to be able to care for the children on the upcoming weekend but would be for subsequent weekends – Where court noted its protective obligations would require more than the father’s self-diagnosis as to his recovery – Where court satisfied that it was in the best interests of the children that the father provide a certificate to the court from his normal medical practitioner certifying that in their opinion the father is of sufficient health and ability to care for the children on each alternate weekend – Where time that the father would otherwise spend with the children under the orders was suspended. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
| Rice v Asplund [1979] FLC 90-725 |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Graham |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Kovacs |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Ms Gray |
| FILE NUMBER: | CSC | 762 | of | 2010 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 27 August 2014 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Townsville |
| PLACE HEARD: | Townsville |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Tree J |
| HEARING DATE: | 27 August 2014 |
REPRESENTATION
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Sandra Sinclair |
| THE RESPONDENT: | In person |
| SOLICITORS FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Susan Gray |
Orders
Until further order, the time which the children B born … 2005, C born … 2007 and D born …2009 would otherwise have spent with the father pursuant to Order 5 of the Orders of Justice Tree made on 2 October 2013 be forthwith suspended.
The children’s time with the father pursuant to the said Order 5 is to be re-instituted upon:
(a)the father filing a Medical Certificate from his regular treating Medical Practitioner, Dr E, stating that he is fit and well enough to care for the children on each alternate weekend; and
(b)an order of this Court discharging Order 1 hereof.
Upon the father filing the Medical Certificate referred to in Order 2(a) hereof, he has liberty to apply on short notice to the parties to discharge Order 1.
On or before 4:00pm Friday 19 September 2014 the Independent Children's Lawyer and the father make file and serve any affidavit material upon which they intend to rely upon the resumed hearing of the mother’s Application in a Case filed 20 August 2014.
On or before 4:00pm Friday 26 September 2014 the mother make file and serve any material in response to…
Continue reading GRAHAM & KOVACS
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- GRAHAM & KOVACS [2014] FamCA 702
- Case
- [2014] FamCA 702
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was the welfare of the children in light of concerns regarding the father's fitness to care for them. Specifically, the court had to consider the immediate suspension of the existing parenting orders and the criteria that would need to be met for the resumption of the father's time with the children.
Tree J ordered that the children's time with the father be forthwith suspended until further order. This suspension was conditional upon the father filing a medical certificate from his treating practitioner confirming his fitness to care for the children on alternate weekends. The court also stipulated that the father would have liberty to apply on short notice to discharge the suspension order once the medical certificate was filed. The matter was adjourned for further hearing, with directions for the filing and service of affidavit material by the Independent Children's Lawyer, the father, and the mother.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Until further order, the time which the children B born … 2005, C born … 2007 and D born …2009 would otherwise have spent with the father pursuant to Order 5 of the Orders of Justice Tree made on 2 October 2013 be forthwith suspended.
2.
The children’s time with the father pursuant to the said Order 5 is to be re-instituted upon:
(a) the father filing a Medical Certificate from his regular treating Medical Practitioner, Dr E, stating that he is fit and well enough to care for the children on each alternate weekend; and
(b) an order of this Court discharging Order 1 hereof.
3.
Upon the father filing the Medical Certificate referred to in Order 2(a) hereof, he has liberty to apply on short notice to the parties to discharge Order 1.
4.
On or before 4:00pm Friday 19 September 2014 the Independent Children's Lawyer and the father make file and serve any affidavit material upon which they intend to rely upon the resumed hearing of the mother’s Application in a Case filed 20 August 2014.
5.
On or before 4:00pm Friday 26 September 2014 the mother make file and serve any material in response to any material filed by the Independent Children's Lawyer and the father pursuant to Order 4 hereof.
6.
The further hearing of the mother’s Application in a Case filed 20 August be adjourned to a date and time to be advised to the parties in the next sittings of the Court in Cairns week commencing 6 October 2014, with an estimated hearing time of 2 hours.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.