FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| GRAHAM & KOVACS (NO. 3) | [2014] FamCA 829 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Where orders provided for the children to live with the mother and to spend alternate weekends and holiday time with the father – Where those orders broke down and a series of contravention applications were filed – Where the parenting proceedings were part heard – Whether the contravention applications could be heard and determined discretely from those parenting proceedings – Where the contravention applications should be adjourned to be heard and determined with the trial of the substantive parenting proceedings in this case. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Graham |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Kovacs |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Ms Susan Gray |
| FILE NUMBER: | CSC | 762 | of | 2010 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 29 September 2014 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Brisbane |
| PLACE HEARD: | Brisbane |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Kent J |
| HEARING DATE: | 29 September 2014 |
REPRESENTATION
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Ms Sinclair, Solicitor via video link from Family Court, Cairns Registry |
| FOR THE RESPONDENT: | In person via video link from Family Court, Cairns Registry |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Ms Gray, Solicitor via video link from Family Court, Cairns Registry |
Orders
It is ordered that:
The Father’s Contravention Applications filed on 2 April 2013, 20 December 2013 and 8 July 2014 be adjourned before the Honourable Justice Tree to a date to be fixed to be heard and determined with the final trial of these proceedings, subject to any further Order of the Honourable Justice Tree.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Graham & Kovacs has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE |
FILE NUMBER: CSC 762 of 2010
| Ms Graham |
Applicant
And
| Mr Kovacs |
Respondent
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
These parenting proceedings concern the three children, B born in 2005 who is now nine years of age, C born in 2007, now seven years of age, and D born in 2009, now aged four (“the children”).
The parenting proceedings proceeded to a trial in September and October of last year before Tree J. In the result the trial was part-heard and Tree J made some interim orders on 2 October 2013 by the consent of the parties, being Ms Graham (“the mother”) and Mr Kovacs (“the father”), pending the further trial. In brief summary those currently operative orders provided for the children to live with the mother and to spend alternate weekends and holiday time with the father.
Those interim orders soon reached a point where they broke down in that it was on 20 December 2013 that the father filed the first of his contravention applications. He has filed contravention applications on 2 April 2013 (mainly in relation to property matters), but on 20 December 2013 and 8 July 2014 has filed contravention applications with respect to the parenting orders.
In circumstances where Tree J was part-heard in the parenting proceedings in September…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Graham and Kovacs (No 3) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] FamCA 829
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Father's contravention applications should be adjourned to be heard and determined at the final trial of the proceedings.
Kent J reasoned that it was appropriate to adjourn the contravention applications. The court determined that it was in the best interests of the children and the efficient conduct of the proceedings for these matters to be dealt with concurrently with the final trial. This approach aimed to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and ensure a comprehensive resolution of all outstanding issues.
The court ordered that the Father's contravention applications filed on 2 April 2013, 20 December 2013, and 8 July 2014 be adjourned to be heard and determined with the final trial of the proceedings, subject to any further order of Justice Tree.
Orders
Orders of the court
It is ordered that:
1.
The Father’s Contravention Applications filed on 2 April 2013, 20 December 2013 and 8 July 2014 be adjourned before the Honourable Justice Tree to a date to be fixed to be heard and determined with the final trial of these proceedings, subject to any further Order of the Honourable Justice Tree.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.