Grace v Dennis

Case [2019] NSWDC 421


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Grace v Dennis [2019] NSWDC 421
Hearing dates: 12 & 13 August
Date of orders: 15 August 2019
Decision date: 15 August 2019
Jurisdiction:Civil
Before: Judge Levy SC
Decision:

1. Pursuant to s 109(1) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), the plaintiff is granted leave to file a statement of claim to institute and maintain the proceedings claiming damages as compensation for the injuries she sustained in a motor vehicle accident on 6 February 2012;

 

2. The proposed statement of claim the subject of Order (1) above is to be filed within 14 days of today’s date;

 

3. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the plaintiff’s summons filed on 9 May 2019 on the ordinary basis unless otherwise ordered;

 

4. The exhibits may be returned;

 5. Liberty to apply on 7 days’ notice if further or other orders are required.
Catchwords: LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – negligence – motor vehicle accident – claim for damages – whether delay in commencing proceedings has been fully and satisfactorily explained – s 109(3)(a) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW)
Legislation Cited: Limitation Act 1969 (NSW)
Limitation of Actions Act 1974 (Qld)
Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), s 66(2), s 81, s 109
Cases Cited: Djakovic v Perez [2015] NSWCA 174
Eades v Gunestepe [2012] NSWCA 204
Karambelas v Zakvic (No 2) [2014] NSWCA 433
Smith v Grant [2006] NSWCA 244
Walker v Howard [2009] NSWCA 408
Category:Procedural and other rulings
Parties: Bernadette Sheila Grace (Plaintiff)
Michael Thomas Dennis (Defendant)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr L Brazel (Plaintiff)
Mr W Reynolds (Defendant)

  Solicitors:
Somerville Laundry Lomax (Plaintiff)
Moray & Agnew (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2019/145893
Publication restriction: None

Judgment

Table of Contents

Summons

[1]

Background

[2]

Issues for determination

[3] – [6]

Evidence

[7] – [11]

Legislation

[12] – [13]

Applicable legal principles

[14] – [24]

Factual circumstances of the plaintiff

[25] – [63]

Medical assessment chronology

[64] – [93]

Defendant’s evidentiary material

[94] – [98]

Submissions of parties

[99] – [112]

Determination

[113] – [132]

Whether the plaintiff’s explanation for the delay is full

[114] – [130]

Whether the plaintiff’s explanation is satisfactory

[131]

Conclusion concerning plaintiff’s explanation for delay

[132]

Disposition

[133]

Costs

[134]

Orders

[135]

Summons

  1. The plaintiff, Bernadette Grace, filed this summons on 9 May 2019, seeking leave, pursuant to s 109(1)(a) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) (“MAC Act”), to commence proceedings otherwise out-of-time, against the defendant, Michael Dennis, in respect of injuries received in a motor vehicle accident on 6 February 2012.

Background

  1. At about 2.55pm on Monday, 6 February 2012, the defendant drove his vehicle into the rear of the plaintiff’s stationary vehicle. In that collision, the plaintiff sustained musculo-ligamentous injuries to the neck, shoulders, lower back, bruising to her forehead, back of the head, her chest and to both knees. As a result she has developed significant physical and psychological disabilities. Her background circumstances, and those disabilities, have…

Continue reading Grace v Dennis

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Grace v Dennis [2019] NSWDC 421
Case
[2019] NSWDC 421
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Grace v Dennis involved a claim for damages arising from a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 6 February 2012. The plaintiff, Grace, sought compensation for injuries she sustained in the accident. The defendant, Dennis, contested the plaintiff's ability to bring the claim due to the delay in instituting the proceedings. The matter was heard in the Local Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the plaintiff's delay in commencing the proceedings had been fully and satisfactorily explained, thereby warranting an extension of the limitation period as per section 109(3)(a) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW). The court needed to determine if the plaintiff provided sufficient grounds for the delay and if the delay was justified under the relevant statutory provisions.

In delivering its judgment, the court found that the plaintiff had adequately explained the delay in commencing the proceedings. The court considered the evidence presented by the plaintiff, which included details of her medical condition and treatment, and concluded that the delay was due to circumstances beyond her control. As a result, the court granted the plaintiff leave to file a statement of claim and ordered that the proposed statement of claim be filed within 14 days of the judgment date. The defendant was also ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the summons unless otherwise ordered, and the exhibits were to be returned. The court reserved the right to make further orders if necessary.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to s 109(1) of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), the plaintiff is granted leave to file a statement of claim to institute and maintain the proceedings claiming damages as compensation for the injuries she sustained in a motor vehicle accident on 6 February 2012;

2. The proposed statement of claim the subject of Order (1) above is to be filed within 14 days of today’s date;

3. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the plaintiff’s summons filed on 9 May 2019 on the ordinary basis unless otherwise ordered;

4. The exhibits may be returned;

5. Liberty to apply on 7 days’ notice if further or other orders are required.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.