GRACE & GRACE

Case [2020] FCCA 977


FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

GRACE & GRACE [2020] FCCA 977
Catchwords:
FAMILY LAW – Parenting – application for parenting orders – dispute as to the secondary school that the child should attend – the ‘rule’ in Rice & Asplund – whether a Family Report should be prepared – where the child has sensory and emotional difficulties – where there is a long history of the dispute – application for a Family Report dismissed – Final Hearing in relation to schooling matter.

Cases cited:

Raymond & Harold [2009] FamCA 155

Rice & Asplund [1978] FamCA 84

Walter & Walter [2016] FamCAFC 56

Applicant: MR GRACE
Respondent: MS GRACE
File Number: MLC 11376 of 2009
Judgment of: Judge Carter
Hearing date: 16 April 2020
Date of Last Submission: 16 April 2020
Delivered at: Melbourne
Delivered on: 28 April 2020

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Ms Renwick
Solicitors for the Applicant: Coote Family Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms Jenkins
Solicitors for the Respondent: Clancy & Triado

ORDERS

  1. The proceedings are listed for Final Hearing for 1 day commencing 9 October 2020 at 10.00am in relation to the child’s secondary schooling for 2021.

  2. Each of the parties electronically file and serve any Amended Initiating Application or Amended Response, an updated Financial Statement if relevant, and one trial affidavit upon which they seek to rely by no later than 28 days prior to the Final Hearing.

  3. Each of the parties be at liberty to electronically file a short affidavit in reply by no later than 14 days prior to the Final Hearing.

  4. Each party electronically file and serve a case outline by no later than 2 days prior to trial and provide a copy in Word format to Associate.JudgeCarter@federalcircuitcourt.gov.au.

  5. The Father’s Initiating Application filed on 20 February 2020 otherwise be dismissed.

AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A.If in any proceedings there are allegations of family violence and the provisions of section 102NA of the Family Law Act 1975 apply (see attached Family Violence Information Sheet), any unrepresented party will not be permitted to personally cross-examine the other party/parties.

B.Affected unrepresented parties may apply to the Commonwealth Family Violence and Cross-Examination of Parties Scheme (“the Scheme”) for representation but any such application must be made at least 12 weeks prior to the final hearing.

C.Further information about the legislation and the Scheme can be found at Part 4 of the attached Family Violence Information Sheet.

D.If section 102NA applies and a party becomes unrepresented after trial directions have been made, that party is required to promptly advise the Court.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Grace & Grace is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA
AT MELBOURNE

MLC 11376 of 2009

MR GRACE

Applicant

And

MS GRACE

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. The parties in this matter are the parents of X, born in 2008 and aged 11 years (“X”). They had previously engaged in litigation in this Court…

Continue reading GRACE & GRACE

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
GRACE & GRACE [2020] FCCA 977
Case
[2020] FCCA 977
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Grace & Grace*, heard by Judge Carter, the dispute concerned an application for parenting orders regarding the secondary school that a child should attend. The matter involved a long history of dispute and the child's sensory and emotional difficulties.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether a Family Report should be prepared in circumstances where there was a long-standing dispute over schooling and the child had specific needs. The court also considered the application of the 'rule' in *Rice & Asplund* in the context of the schooling dispute.

Judge Carter dismissed the application for a Family Report. The court determined that, given the history of the proceedings and the specific nature of the dispute, a Family Report was not necessary for the final determination of the schooling matter. The court then listed the matter for a final hearing to resolve the secondary schooling arrangements for the child in 2021.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The proceedings are listed for Final Hearing for 1 day commencing 9 October 2020 at 10.00am in relation to the child’s secondary schooling for 2021.

2.

Each of the parties electronically file and serve any Amended Initiating Application or Amended Response, an updated Financial Statement if relevant, and one trial affidavit upon which they seek to rely by no later than 28 days prior to the Final Hearing.

3.

Each of the parties be at liberty to electronically file a short affidavit in reply by no later than 14 days prior to the Final Hearing.

4.

Each party electronically file and serve a case outline by no later than 2 days prior to trial and provide a copy in Word format to Associate.JudgeCarter@federalcircuitcourt.gov.au.

5.

The Father’s Initiating Application filed on 20 February 2020 otherwise be dismissed.

AND THE COURT NOTES THAT:

A. If in any proceedings there are allegations of family violence and the provisions of section 102NA of the Family Law Act 1975 apply (see attached Family Violence Information Sheet), any unrepresented party will not be permitted to personally cross-examine the other party/parties.

B. Affected unrepresented parties may apply to the Commonwealth Family Violence and Cross-Examination of Parties Scheme (“the Scheme”) for representation but any such application must be made at least 12 weeks prior to the final hearing.

C. Further information about the legislation and the Scheme can be found at Part 4 of the attached Family Violence Information Sheet.

D. If section 102NA applies and a party becomes unrepresented after trial directions have been made, that party is required to promptly advise the Court.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.