Goudarzi and Bagheri
Case
•
[2017] FamCA 656
•24 August 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Goudarzi and Bagheri [2017] FamCA 656
[2017] FamCA 656
24 August 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Goudarzi and Bagheri*, heard before Loughnan J, the dispute concerned objections raised by the mother to specific paragraphs of a subpoena issued to the Proper Officer of KK Pty Ltd.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the mother's objections to paragraphs 3 and 4 of the subpoena should be upheld.
Loughnan J rejected the mother's objections, finding that the documents sought by the subpoena were relevant to the proceedings. The Court allowed the parties leave to inspect all documents produced pursuant to the subpoena, as amended by agreement and by the Court. The Court also noted the terms of prior orders made on 16 August 2017 concerning the practical arrangements for inspection.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the mother's objections to paragraphs 3 and 4 of the subpoena should be upheld.
Loughnan J rejected the mother's objections, finding that the documents sought by the subpoena were relevant to the proceedings. The Court allowed the parties leave to inspect all documents produced pursuant to the subpoena, as amended by agreement and by the Court. The Court also noted the terms of prior orders made on 16 August 2017 concerning the practical arrangements for inspection.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Discovery
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Goudarzi and Bagheri [2017] FamCA 656
Most Recent Citation
Newsome & Newsome [2025] FedCFamC2F 747
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Newsome & Newsome
[2025] FedCFamC2F 747
Newsome & Newsome
[2025] FedCFamC2F 747
Cases Cited
13
Statutory Material Cited
9
Mann v Carnell
[1999] HCA 66
Craine v Colonial Mutual Fire Insurance Co Ltd
[1920] HCA 64
Commissioner of Taxation v Rio Tinto Ltd
[2006] FCAFC 86