Goudarzi and Bagheri

Case

[2017] FamCA 656

24 August 2017


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Goudarzi and Bagheri [2017] FamCA 656 [2017] FamCA 656 24 August 2017

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Goudarzi and Bagheri*, heard before Loughnan J, the dispute concerned objections raised by the mother to specific paragraphs of a subpoena issued to the Proper Officer of KK Pty Ltd.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether the mother's objections to paragraphs 3 and 4 of the subpoena should be upheld.

Loughnan J rejected the mother's objections, finding that the documents sought by the subpoena were relevant to the proceedings. The Court allowed the parties leave to inspect all documents produced pursuant to the subpoena, as amended by agreement and by the Court. The Court also noted the terms of prior orders made on 16 August 2017 concerning the practical arrangements for inspection.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Family Law

Legal Concepts

  • Discovery

  • Jurisdiction

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

2

Newsome & Newsome [2025] FedCFamC2F 747
Newsome & Newsome [2025] FedCFamC2F 747
Cases Cited

13

Statutory Material Cited

9

Mann v Carnell [1999] HCA 66