Gosden v Valuer-General

Case [2013] QLC 7


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Gosden & Anor v Valuer-General [2013] QLC 7
PARTIES: Michael Thomas and Irene Gladys Gosden
(appellants)
v.

Valuer-General
(respondent)

FILE NOS: VLA372-10 and VLA373-10
DIVISION: General Division
PROCEEDINGS: Appeals against annual valuations
DELIVERED ON: 5 March 2013
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
HEARD AT: Dalby
PRESIDENT: CAC MacDonald
ORDER:

1.   Appeal VLA373-10 is dismissed. 

2.   The unimproved value of Lot 97 on M606 in the County of Lytton, Parish of Macalister, as at 1 October 2009, is affirmed at Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000).

3.   Appeal VLA372-10 is allowed.

4.   The unimproved value of Lots 94 - 96 on M606 in the County of Lytton, Parish of Macalister, held under Term Lease 211021, as at 1 October 2009, is determined at Forty-five Thousand Dollars ($45,000).  

CATCHWORDS:

Valuation - unimproved value - residential land - sales evidence - defects of subject land - valuation deemed to be correct.

Valuation - unimproved value of leasehold land - sales evidence - defects of subject land.

Valuation of Land Act 1944

APPEARANCES: Mr MT Gosden in person, for the appellants
Mr P Prasad, Senior Lawyer, Department of Natural Resources and Mines, for the respondent
  1. This decision deals with two appeals by Michael Thomas and Irene Gladys Gosden (the appellants) against annual valuations of two properties, as issued by the Valuer-General (the respondent), as at 1 October 2009, under the provisions of the Valuation of Land Act 1944 (the Act). 

  2. The appeals were heard together in Dalby where Mr M Gosden, one of the appellants, appeared for and gave evidence on behalf of the appellants.  The respondent was represented at the hearing by Mr P Prasad.  Mr S Doyle, a registered valuer employed by the Valuer-General, gave evidence on behalf of the respondent. 

  3. Before the hearing, I carried out an inspection of the subject properties in the presence of Mr Gosden, Mr Prasad and Mr Doyle.  I found that the inspection assisted me in my understanding of the evidence. 

  4. Although the appeals were heard together and the sales and some other evidence were common to both appeals, it is convenient to deal with each appeal separately and to consider appeal VLA373-10 initially.

VLA373-10 

  1. This appeal concerns a parcel of freehold land described as Lot 97 on M606, County of Lytton, Parish of Macalister, having an area of 1012 m².

  2. Mr Doyle described the property as comprising near level black soil country cleared to grass.  It is situated on an unnamed road off Macalister-Wilkie Creek Road, Macalister, approximately 25 kms radially north-west of the Dalby Post Office.  The land is zoned "Small Town" under the planning scheme for the former shire of Wambo, which took effect on 22 April 2005.

  3. Mr Doyle said that access to the property is gained by an unformed road.  The access is fair in dry weather, but poor in wet weather.  He also said that electricity and telephone services were available for connection to the property, although the availability of electricity was disputed by Mr Gosden.  This is discussed…

Continue reading Gosden v Valuer-General

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Gosden v Valuer-General [2013] QLC 7
Case
[2013] QLC 7
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Gosden v Valuer-General involved a dispute over the valuation of unimproved land in Queensland, specifically Lot 97 on M606 in the County of Lytton, Parish of Macalister, and Lots 94 - 96 on the same map, held under Term Lease 211021. The case was heard and determined by the Queensland Land Court. The appellant, Gosden, contested the unimproved value assessments assigned by the respondent, the Valuer-General, for the specified lots. Gosden argued that the assessments did not appropriately account for certain defects of the subject land and the sales evidence provided.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the assessments of unimproved value for the subject land were correctly determined in accordance with the relevant statutory framework, particularly the Valuation of Land Act 1944. Gosden contended that the assessments did not adequately reflect the true unimproved value of the land, considering the defects and the comparative sales evidence. The court was required to evaluate the Valuer-General's assessment process and the evidence provided to determine if the statutory requirements were met.

The court found that the assessment of the unimproved value for Lot 97 was correct and affirmed the Valuer-General's valuation at Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000). However, regarding Lots 94 - 96, the court allowed the appeal and determined the unimproved value at Forty-five Thousand Dollars ($45,000), differing from the Valuer-General's assessment. The court's reasoning hinged on the appropriate consideration of the defects and comparative sales evidence in line with the statutory provisions. The final orders of the court dismissed the appeal for Lot 97 and allowed the appeal for Lots 94 - 96, with the specified valuations.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Appeal VLA373-10 is dismissed.

2. The unimproved value of Lot 97 on M606 in the County of Lytton, Parish of Macalister, as at 1 October 2009, is affirmed at Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000).

3. Appeal VLA372-10 is allowed.

4. The unimproved value of Lots 94 - 96 on M606 in the County of Lytton, Parish of Macalister, held under Term Lease 211021, as at 1 October 2009, is determined at Forty-five Thousand Dollars ($45,000).

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.