Good Food Partners Pty Ltd T/A Good Food Partners Pty Ltd

Case

[2023] FWCA 2647

22 AUGUST 2023


[2023] FWCA 2647

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.210—Enterprise agreement

Good Food Partners Pty Ltd T/A Good Food Partners Pty Ltd

(AG2023/2410)

GOOD FOOD PARTNERS OPERATIONS PTY LTD (DANDENONG OPERATION) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2022

Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry

COMMISSIONER WILSON

MELBOURNE, 22 AUGUST 2023

Application for variation of the Good Food Partners Operations Pty Ltd (Dandenong Operation) Enterprise Agreement 2022

  1. An application has been made for approval of a variation to the Good Food Partners Operations Pty Ltd (Dandenong Operation) Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made by Good Food Partners Pty Ltd T/A Good Food Partners Pty Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

  1. The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure B. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any affected employee for the variation and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the variation. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.211 and 212 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.

  1. In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 22 August 2023.


COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE516492  PR765393>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0