Goldstein v Whaley; Whaley v Goldstein

Link copied
Case Copied 11 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Goldstein v Whaley; Whaley v Goldstein [2021] NSWCATCD 134
Hearing dates: 7 September 2021
Date of orders: 16 November 2021
Decision date: 16 November 2021
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: J Searson – General Member
Decision:

1. The tenants Tom Goldstein and Asaf Dressler are to pay the landlord Heath Whaley the sum of $4746.48 within 28 days of the date of these orders.

2. Renting Services is to pay the landlord the whole of the bond plus interest of rental bond number S190984-8 any amount received is to be credited against the money order.

3. The respondent / landlord’s name is amended in matters RT21/23938 and RT21/36238 to Heath Whaley.

Catchwords:

RESIDENTIAL TENANCY — Compensation — Bond

Legislation Cited:

Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW)

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Pearson v Clark [2016] NSWCATAP 134

Elhassen v Ayoub [2018] NSWCATAP 34

Patricia Panico v Carolyn Crompton and Rodney Jennings [2015] NSWCATAP 110

Alamdo Holdings Pty Limited v Australian Window Furnishings (NSW) Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 224

Haskell v Marlow [1928] 2 KB 45

Adoncello v Sazdanoff [2006] NSWCTTT 577

Fitzpatrick v Wu (RTT01/16425)

Texts Cited:

Nil

Category:Principal judgment
Parties:

In RT 21/23938:
Tom Goldstein (Applicant)
Asaf Dressler (Applicant)
Heath Whaley (Respondent)

In RT21/36238:
Heath Whaley (Applicant)
Tom Goldstein (Respondent)
Asaf Dressler (Respondent)
Representation:

In RT 21/23938:
Applicants (Self-represented)
E James (Agent) (Respondent)

In RT21/36238:
E James (Agent) (Applicant)
Respondents (Self-represented)
File Number(s): RT21/23938
RT21/36238
Publication restriction: Nil

REASONS FOR DECISION

background

  1. The tenant made an application under section 175 of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (NSW)("RT Act") on 1 June 2021 ("the tenant's application").

  2. The landlord made an application under sections 175, and 187 of the RT Act on 25 August 2021 ("the landlord's application").

  3. The tenant's application (RT21/23938) sought orders with respect to payment of the bond of $3800.

  4. The landlord's application (RT 21/36238) sought payment of compensation in the total amount of $18494.30 or $14694.30 after payment of the bond.

  5. As these matters relied on the same facts they were heard together in a virtual hearing room at Gosford on 7 September 2021.

  6. The following reasons for decision relate to both matters.

Jurisdiction

  1. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to hear and determine this matter. The applicant are both a tenant and a landlord respectively and the dispute relates to a residential tenancy within the meaning of the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (“RT Act”).

  2. The Tribunal is a statutory body, established on 1 January 2014 by the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) section 7(2)(a) (‘NCAT Act’).

  3. Under Schedule 4 section 3 of the NCAT Act, the Tribunal’s Consumer and Commercial Division has jurisdiction in relation to matters arising under the Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (“RT Act”).

  4. The parties entered into a fixed term agreement which commenced on 30 May 2020 and ended on 29 May 2021 to lease the premises situated at XXX Belongi Crescent…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Goldstein v Whaley; Whaley v Goldstein and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWCATCD 134
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Tom Goldstein and Asaf Dressler (the tenants) brought an action against Heath Whaley (the landlord), seeking to have the amount they owed for damages to the premises reduced. The landlord counterclaimed, arguing that the tenants had not fulfilled their obligation to return the bond and pay any outstanding amounts. The case was heard in the Residential Tenancy Tribunal of New South Wales. The central legal issues revolved around the amount of compensation owed by the tenants for damages to the premises and whether the tenants had fulfilled their obligation to return the bond and pay any outstanding amounts to the landlord.

The tribunal found that the tenants had not fulfilled their obligation to return the bond and pay any outstanding amounts. The tribunal found that the tenants owed the landlord the sum of $4746.48 for damages to the premises. The tribunal also found that the tenants had not fulfilled their obligation to return the bond and pay any outstanding amounts. The tribunal ordered that the tenants pay the landlord the sum of $4746.48 within 28 days of the date of the orders. The tribunal also ordered that Renting Services pay the landlord the whole of the bond plus interest of rental bond number S190984-8 any amount received is to be credited against the money order. The tribunal further amended the landlord’s name in matters RT21/23938 and RT21/36238 to Heath Whaley.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The tenants Tom Goldstein and Asaf Dressler are to pay the landlord Heath Whaley the sum of $4746.48 within 28 days of the date of these orders.

2. Renting Services is to pay the landlord the whole of the bond plus interest of rental bond number S190984-8 any amount received is to be credited against the money order.

3. The respondent / landlord’s name is amended in matters RT21/23938 and RT21/36238 to Heath Whaley.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.